Taiwan, tell us who you are
Most Americans learned about Taiwan because of the Little League World Series, which it seems was always won by the Taiwanese kids. Other than that, Taiwan rarely comes up on the average American's radar screen. This is because our media here in the States is dominated by liberals, who are rapidly becoming a minority as they continue to criticize the Bush administration and the policies of the Republicans. The Democratic Party here is no longer in touch with the people and their interests. Between big business interests (drooling over the looming consumer market in China) and the liberals' eagerness to avoid conflict, we do not get a clear picture of Taiwan. And Taiwan does not help clarify the situation.
As a result of these dynamics, all the average person hears is that there is some sort of confusion about this possible rogue province of mainland China that sits on the brink of yet another American war.
I wonder if the world knows how strongly the American people support Bush and his administration. He is supported because he is strong in principle and resolve; he speaks for the greater good.
Americans need to hear from Taiwan about its identity. Who are you? Where are you going? Clean up your politics and create a new constitution that is legitimate. (Note that Japan is talking about a new constitution.) Declare yourselves Taiwanese. Make it clear that the Chinese flight from the mainland was little more than an occupation like the one the Japanese perpetrated. Reveal your culture and Taiwanese heritage to the world in a massive public relations campaign. Continue the policy of an official name change. Hold a referendum on independence. I know the US is putting strong pressure against this -- they must, in light of their special interest in China. But once the people of Taiwan have spoken, the people of the US will absolutely support a position as democratic as this. Then our politicians will have a hard time telling us lies and suppressing the evolution of Taiwan as a free nation. Look how far we are willing to go to protect the rights of people in the Middle East.
The UN should have long before now accepted Taiwan, but they too can plead confusion as to exactly what Taiwan is and what it wants.
Taiwan -- a country with its own heritage (mixed with other regional influences), a modern constitution, a referendum mandate for self-determination, a representative government, and a formidable economic and developmental entity -- is something that Americans can understand. If this is something that Taiwan is willing to fight for, then I think you will find a friend and willing ally at your side. Just tell us who you are and what you want. Be strong in principle and resolve. Speak for the greater good of your people and let's move beyond old world threats into the future.
John Rieder
Ballwin, Missouri
Quality English teachers
Mark Wilbur (Letters, Nov 19, page 8) missed three important criteria: one, professional training in foreign language education; two, personality traits and talent; and three, a driving force of learning and growing.
The current situation in Taiwan reflects a kind of reverse discrimination. Native speakers of English are hired, regardless of their professional training, personality and professional attitude. Talented and well-trained local teachers don't even get interviewed.
On top of this, "native speakers are usually given far more power than they deserve," as Stephen Krashen said (Letter, Nov. 15, page 8). Many American teachers know that and take advantage of it.
"Black cats, white cats, or yellow cats, any cat that catches mice is a good cat." Yellow cats and black cats deserve equal opportunity.
Wu Ching-shyue
Associate professor
Chaoyang University
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS