World history has a Republic of China (ROC) and a People's Republic of China (PRC) but no "one China."
The emergence of the "one China" concept has been a self-deceiving fabrication from the beginning. It is a play with words and a case of international fraud.
From the provisional constitution passed when the ROC was established in 1912 to the current ROC Constitution, there has been no mention of "one China," only the ROC. Before the PRC was founded in 1949, no one had ever said that the "one China is the Republic of China," just as no one has ever said that the "one America is the United States of America" or the "one UK is the United Kingdom."
Only after the Chinese Communist Party defeated the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and announced the abolition of the ROC Constitution and the replacement of the ROC with the PRC did the concept of "one China" emerge.
The KMT government, forced into exile in Taiwan, then borrowed two "shells" from the already extinct ROC to put into place in Taiwan -- the "shells" of the national title of the ROC and the ROC Constitution. The government also claimed that there was only one China in the world and that the ROC was the only legitimate government representing China.
At that time, the world was divided into two blocks. The US supported the ROC government in Taiwan, which opposed the communists and resisted Russia, and represented China as one of the permanent members of the UN Security Council. The US refused to let the PRC enter the UN. This situation lasted for 22 years. At that time, the illusory "one China" was apparently advantageous for the KMT government in Taiwan.
The world changed in the 1970s. As the Nixon administration adopted the strategy of "uniting with China to contain Russia," the fabricated content of the "one China" concept was altered as well. In 1972, the US and China signed the Shanghai Communique to settle their dif-ferences over the Taiwan issue.
Former US secretary of state and national security adviser Henry Kissinger came up with his famous statement: "All Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China. The United States government does not challenge that position."
From then on, an international scam created by the "one China" policy or "one China" principle has long dominated the relations between Taiwan, the US and China. It is increasingly unfavorable to Taiwan.
On Jan. 1, 1979, the US announced it would sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan, withdraw its troops, abolish treaties and recognize "the government of the People's Republic of China as the sole legitimate government of China." The idea that "one China is the ROC" was no longer tenable in the international community.
The basis of the US government's "one China" policy is that it does not challenge the position that "all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China." Once the 23 million people on this side of the Strait renounce the fictitious concept that "one China is the ROC" and give "China" back to the 1.3 billion Chinese on the other side of the Strait, the US government's "one China" policy will collapse without being attacked.
This is neither provocation nor a change in the status quo. This is facing up to the fact that there is one country on each side of the Strait, bidding farewell to the self-deceiving illusion of "one China" and putting an end to the meaningless play on words and ludicrous international scam.
Ruan Ming is a visiting professor at Tamkang University and a former special assistant to late Chinese Communist Party secretary-general Hu Yaobang (
Translated by Jackie Lin
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS