Only one day after President Chen Shui-bian (
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) had been right in pointing out after it came to power that the actual number of official diplomatic allies is not the most important aspect of foreign affairs, but that constructive and substantive foreign ties are what matter most. Still, the newly established diplomatic ties with Kiribati is an encouraging breakthrough.
Anyone who doubts the importance of these ties should first understand their background and context -- an ongoing zero-sum battle of diplomacy between China and Taiwan, with China absolutely prohibiting its diplomatic allies from formally recognizing Taiwan.
As a result, most countries have opted for the easy way out, that is, to forego formal recognition of Taiwan while maintaining substantive informal ties with the country. Under the circumstances the importance to Taiwan of each and every formal diplomatic ally goes without saying.
To Chen and the DPP, the establishment of ties with Kiribati is especially significant, since it marks the first formal diplomatic ties entered into during Chen's presidency, after having lost three allies in a series of vicious and deliberate diplomatic assaults by China. Anyone who had hoped that the change of leadership in China, that is, the succession to power by President Hu Jintao (
That China is far from relaxing its foreign affairs assault is demonstrated by its high-handed obstruction of Taiwan's participation in the World Health Organization earlier this year at the height of the SARS outbreak, the plots to downgrade Taiwan's membership status in the World Trade Organization (WTO), and China's efforts to force other countries to reject Taiwan's new passports, just because the word "Taiwan" appears on the cover.
In recent years, China has also increasingly abused its growing power in the UN to accomplish its agenda. As pointed out by Minister of Foreign Affairs Eugene Chien (
As for the three countries that have severed diplomatic ties with Taiwan during the past three years, China had even painstakingly timed the break-ups to add insult to injury -- Macedonia right after Chen returned from an earlier overseas visit, Nauru right after Chen took over as chairman of the DPP, and Liberia around the time Taiwan was celebrating Double-Ten Day last month.
Predictably, some opposition lawmakers will try to put a damper on the excitement over the formal ties with Kiribati by questioning whether it was accomplished as part of "monetary diplomacy." Leaving aside the issue that the opposition, as members of the former ruling party, should understand the dilemma and difficulties faced by Taiwan in the sticky area of foreign ties, isn't it also our duty as a member of the WTO, for which the preamble clearly states helping developing and third world countries as a goal, to offer assistance and aid to our developing allies?
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS