To prepare for eastward expansion next year, EU members convened an intergovernmental conference on Oct. 4 to negotiate and discuss the content of the draft EU constitution.
If all goes well, the 25 current and future EU members will sign the draft constitution on Europe Day next year and complete domestic ratification procedures over the following two years.
This draft constitution includes five main points: establishing a president's post with a term of two and a half years; establishing an EU foreign minister's post; formulating a common defense and foreign policy; mapping out the legally binding European Charter of Fundamental Rights; and endowing the EU with the status of a "juridical person."
To enable this draft constitution to accommodate an enlarged EU, and to thoroughly transform the current EU structure and mechanisms, former French president Valery Giscard d'Estaing chaired the European Convention to hear people's opinions regarding institutional reforms and the EU's development through public and transparent discussions. This is to make sure that EU policy truly reflects the thoughts of Europeans.
To achieve lasting peace and stability, EU countries drafted their constitution from a long-term point of view. Based on the common goal of constructing a beautiful Europe, the members have repeatedly consulted each other, showing this community's tolerance for dissent.
Since the European Convention was established to create a constitution, EU institutions and the community's new and old members have all joined hands to participate in the discussions. These discussions have highlighted the EU's respect for the public will in each country, and its pursuit of shared values to create a new European culture.
Taiwan can learn a lesson from the EU. At the ceremony celebrating the Democratic Progressive Party's 17th anniversary, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) said, "By working with the 23 million Taiwanese people, the party should push for a new constitution in 2006 and put it to a referendum."
This is a proposal that fits in with the trends of the time. Taiwan should emulate EU countries to formulate a new constitution that regards Taiwan as the primary entity and meets real needs. People's collective will should be expressed through a referendum. This can strengthen the legality, legitimacy and feasibility of Taiwan's new constitution, thereby putting into practice the idea of "people power."
Taiwan's democratization requires strengthening and deepening. It is a matter of great urgency to write a new, feasible constitution to project a grand vision for Taiwan's existence and development in the international community, establish a sound political structure, and further safeguard people's freedoms and rights.
A new constitution is indispensable for Taiwan to become a normal, first-class country.
Chen Lung-chu is the chairman of the Taiwan New Century Foundation.
Translated by Jackie Lin
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS