To prepare for eastward expansion next year, EU members convened an intergovernmental conference on Oct. 4 to negotiate and discuss the content of the draft EU constitution.
If all goes well, the 25 current and future EU members will sign the draft constitution on Europe Day next year and complete domestic ratification procedures over the following two years.
This draft constitution includes five main points: establishing a president's post with a term of two and a half years; establishing an EU foreign minister's post; formulating a common defense and foreign policy; mapping out the legally binding European Charter of Fundamental Rights; and endowing the EU with the status of a "juridical person."
To enable this draft constitution to accommodate an enlarged EU, and to thoroughly transform the current EU structure and mechanisms, former French president Valery Giscard d'Estaing chaired the European Convention to hear people's opinions regarding institutional reforms and the EU's development through public and transparent discussions. This is to make sure that EU policy truly reflects the thoughts of Europeans.
To achieve lasting peace and stability, EU countries drafted their constitution from a long-term point of view. Based on the common goal of constructing a beautiful Europe, the members have repeatedly consulted each other, showing this community's tolerance for dissent.
Since the European Convention was established to create a constitution, EU institutions and the community's new and old members have all joined hands to participate in the discussions. These discussions have highlighted the EU's respect for the public will in each country, and its pursuit of shared values to create a new European culture.
Taiwan can learn a lesson from the EU. At the ceremony celebrating the Democratic Progressive Party's 17th anniversary, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) said, "By working with the 23 million Taiwanese people, the party should push for a new constitution in 2006 and put it to a referendum."
This is a proposal that fits in with the trends of the time. Taiwan should emulate EU countries to formulate a new constitution that regards Taiwan as the primary entity and meets real needs. People's collective will should be expressed through a referendum. This can strengthen the legality, legitimacy and feasibility of Taiwan's new constitution, thereby putting into practice the idea of "people power."
Taiwan's democratization requires strengthening and deepening. It is a matter of great urgency to write a new, feasible constitution to project a grand vision for Taiwan's existence and development in the international community, establish a sound political structure, and further safeguard people's freedoms and rights.
A new constitution is indispensable for Taiwan to become a normal, first-class country.
Chen Lung-chu is the chairman of the Taiwan New Century Foundation.
Translated by Jackie Lin
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS