France under President Jacques Chirac is quickly becoming united Europe's biggest nightmare. It is bad enough Chirac is splitting Europe with the promotion of his so-called "multi-polar" foreign policy. Now France's blatant flaunting of the EU's Stability Pact, which caps deficit spending at 3 percent of GDP, is speeding Europe to an important crossroads that threatens to undermine both European monetary union and the euro itself.
The EU's smaller countries, in particular, are furious with France over its stubborn refusal to play by the EU's deficit-spending rules. They see French defiance as more than just a narrow issue over fiscal numbers.
"It concerns whether the big countries are willing to sacrifice any measure of national sovereignty for the European good," said one influential ECB official. "The Germans at least are trying to rein in their deficits," the official went on. "But the French simply do not care."
The act precipitating the current crisis is France's decision to go ahead with the cut in the personal income tax Chirac promised during his election campaign of last year. The tax cut will put France's fiscal deficit over the 3 percent limit for three years in a row -- at an estimated 4.5 percent of GDP for next year -- because it will not be financed by offsetting cuts in public expenditure.
Of course, some believe an income-tax cut is precisely what the French economy needs. Perhaps. But as attractive as an income-tax cut may look on narrow nationalistic grounds, there is more than just the French national interest to be considered. For if France can get away with its flagrant violation of the Stability Pact rules, others will follow the French lead.
An orgy of deficit spending throughout the euro-zone economy is certain to result, as welfare state pressure groups in individual member states attempt to make up for prior restraint. This will cause many to have second thoughts about European monetary union. After all, who wants a monetary union that bloats the welfare state and is an engine for inflation?
Moreover, once the constraints on deficit spending are off, a major incentive for badly needed structural reform in Europe will be removed. Europe's politicians will be tempted to simply jack up the fiscal deficit to boost domestic incomes rather than undergo politically painful but necessary rationalization. Structural stagflation -- high inflation and low economic growth -- will result.
The EU Commission must act now or face a possible revolt from the smaller countries. Sweden's rejection of the euro already has sounded the alarm.
Hitting the French with a hefty fine -- the penalty provided by the Stability Pact -- is not a good idea. Under its current rules, three big countries (France, Germany, and Italy) could -- and probably would -- block the sanction. Even if the penalty were imposed, the French would not pay.
France's occupation of the Netherlands during the so-called French Period at the turn of the 19th century suggests a better alternative. France then imposed a penalty tax on the province of Zeeland for running a sizeable fiscal deficit. When the Zeelanders refused to pay, the French responded by centralizing what had been until that point a rather de-centralized Dutch fiscal system.
What worked then may work now. Centralization of the public finances of member states, though a radical step, may be the only answer to the problem of recalcitrant countries like France that refuse to play by the budget rules.
The issue of how much of a double standard the EU's smaller countries are willing to accept has been brought to a head by Chirac's blatant flaunting of the Stability Pact rules. By rejecting the euro, Sweden, itself a small country, made it clear that it didn't want to be part of a Europe that discriminated against small countries. What will it take, one wonders, before others among the smaller member countries follow suit?
Melvyn Krauss is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University. COPYRIGHT: PROJECT SYNDICATE
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has its chairperson election tomorrow. Although the party has long positioned itself as “China friendly,” the election is overshadowed by “an overwhelming wave of Chinese intervention.” The six candidates vying for the chair are former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), former lawmaker Cheng Li-wen (鄭麗文), Legislator Luo Chih-chiang (羅智強), Sun Yat-sen School president Chang Ya-chung (張亞中), former National Assembly representative Tsai Chih-hong (蔡志弘) and former Changhua County comissioner Zhuo Bo-yuan (卓伯源). While Cheng and Hau are front-runners in different surveys, Hau has complained of an online defamation campaign against him coming from accounts with foreign IP addresses,
Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmaker Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) on Saturday won the party’s chairperson election with 65,122 votes, or 50.15 percent of the votes, becoming the second woman in the seat and the first to have switched allegiance from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to the KMT. Cheng, running for the top KMT position for the first time, had been termed a “dark horse,” while the biggest contender was former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), considered by many to represent the party’s establishment elite. Hau also has substantial experience in government and in the KMT. Cheng joined the Wild Lily Student
When Taiwan High Speed Rail Corp (THSRC) announced the implementation of a new “quiet carriage” policy across all train cars on Sept. 22, I — a classroom teacher who frequently takes the high-speed rail — was filled with anticipation. The days of passengers videoconferencing as if there were no one else on the train, playing videos at full volume or speaking loudly without regard for others finally seemed numbered. However, this battle for silence was lost after less than one month. Faced with emotional guilt from infants and anxious parents, THSRC caved and retreated. However, official high-speed rail data have long
Starting next year, drivers older than 70 may be entitled to a monthly NT$1,500 public transportation and taxi subsidy if they relinquish their driver’s license, the Ministry of Transportation and Communications announced on Tuesday. The measure is part of a broader effort to improve road safety, with eligible participants receiving the subsidy for two years. The announcement comes amid mounting concern over traffic safety in Taiwan. A 2022 article by CNN quoted the name of a Facebook group devoted to the traffic situation called “Taiwan is a living hell for pedestrians,” while Berlin-based bne IntelliNews last month called it a “deadly