With the severing of diplomatic relations with Liberia, the number of Taiwan's diplomatic allies has fallen to 26. To take political responsibility, Minister of Foreign Affairs Eugene Chien (簡又新) has tendered his resignation. This is a responsible action by a political appointee, but Chien does not really need to step down over the issue. On the contrary, it was a big relief for Taiwan to bid farewell to Liberia.
Liberia has been notorious for its endless civil wars, which have made the country one of the poorest in the world. Former president Charles Taylor earned international condemnation with his human rights abuses and brutal suppression of dissent. In 2001, the UN passed a resolution imposing sanctions on the country. In response to calls from the Liberian people, the US has sent troops there and forced Taylor to leave the country. From abroad, however, Taylor continues to wield influence on Liberian politics.
Taiwan's diplomatic predicament leaves little room for the country to be picky about with whom it wants to make friends. But a disreputable friend like the Taylor government has been an embarrassment for a country that claims to attach importance to human rights. Taiwan knew that Taylor's government ignored its people's welfare and trampled on human rights, that the country's economy was a shambles and that bureaucratic corruption was rampant. But diplomatic ties prevented Taiwan from condemning Liberia. Instead, Taiwan had to support such a government. In the face of international criticism regarding its double standards on human rights, Taiwan could only stay quiet. Liberia's departure frees Taiwan from a huge burden.
In a broader context, the severance of ties with Liberia was driven by international factors that Taiwan can hardly reverse. Like Macedonia, Liberia has been facing civil war and needs to rely on UN resources and peacekeeping forces. Using its power as a permanent member of the Security Council, China has pressured Liberia to switch diplomatic relations, and Liberia has obliged, for the sake of peacekeeping troops and US$250 million in aid. All this was not due to any lapse or mistake on the part of Taiwan's foreign affairs authorities. They have done their best. Chien does not need to resign.
Ostensibly, China has won another diplomatic ally and further isolated Taiwan. In reality, however, the Taiwanese public's perceptions of the ROC's diplomatic fortunes have been changing ever since former president Lee Teng-hui (
China has been low-key about establishing diplomatic ties with Liberia, apparently loathe to agitate Taiwan. But knowledgeable people in Taiwan have already woken up to the fact that the more China tries to squeeze the ROC's diplomatic space, the more Taiwanese people will realize that the ROC no longer exists in the international community. This will see more people supporting the movements promoting a name change for the ROC and a new constitution. Perhaps many Taiwanese will thank China for helping to cut diplomatic ties with Liberia.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic