In the gently undulating semi-desert, 10 minutes' drive from the dusty northern Jordanian town of Mafraq and the old single-track Hejaz Railway that Lawrence of Arabia targeted 85 years ago, lies the sprawling campus of an international university which forms part of Jordan's strategy to counter extremist Islam.
In a part of the world often associated in the West with bigoted fundamentalism, Aal al-Bait University has a "special mission," says its president, Salman al-Badur: "To teach students academic subjects; and to create Islamic moderation, Islamic tolerance."
Established in 1993, the university was part of Jordan's answer to the rising regional tide of Islamic fundamentalism.
"When King Hussein dedicated this university, he stated this very clearly," al-Badur said. "We are here to teach tolerance. We're not limited to one point of view -- the Sunni, or the Shia, the Zaidi or the Alawi.
We teach all Islamic traditions."
He explained: "Every student, even those studying subjects such as computer science, physics and chemistry, has to be acquainted with the problems facing the Islamic world, with the differences between Muslims themselves. Every student has to study comparative religion."
Aal al-Bait -- which roughly translates as "family of the Prophet" -- now has some 7,000 students and 300 teaching staff. Most of the students are Jordanian but a significant number are foreign.
"We have students from Malaysia, Iran, Indonesia, Brunei, the US, Russia, Herzegovina, Ghana and Senegal," said al-Badur, a philosopher who has studied and taught at universities as diverse as Damascus, Tehran, Princeton and Harvard.
As in all eight of Jordan's public universities, academic standards at Aal al-Bait are high and competition for places is fierce. The university's preoccupation with Islam does not mean that the students are all Muslims. Echoing the religious structure of the kingdom's 5 million people, they include some Christians.
Islamism is nothing new in Jordan. The country's first King, Abdullah, encouraged conservative Islamic sentiment as a means of staving off the demands for greater democracy of secular-minded Arab nationalists. His successor, King Hussain, while paying necessary lip-service to nationalism, took a similar line. After the catastrophic Arab defeat in the 1967 war with Israel, however, nationalism declined and Islamism became the region's most dynamic political force, threatening the existing order, including the conservative, Western-backed monarchies like Jordan's that had survived nationalist hegemony.
In Syria and Iraq and other states, Islamism was held in check by sweeping and cruel repression. King Hussain took another, arguably more intelligent, road, seeking to tame the Islamists by making them an integral part of the system as the "loyal opposition."
In 1989, Jordan held its first free and fair general election for three decades. The Islamic Action Front (IAF) -- essentially the political wing of the main Islamist movement, the Ikhwan al-Muslimoun or Muslim Brotherhood -- won 22 parliamentary seats, a quarter of the total.
This was a bit more than the regime had anticipated. For the 1993 elections the voting rules were changed in a way that would work against the IAF, whose seats declined to 19. Angered, the IAF boycotted the 1997 elections. The 2000 election was delayed until June this year, when the IAF returned 17 members to parliament, including one woman. In addition, the IAF could count on the support of five or six independent Islamists.
Although far from forming a parliamentary majority, the IAF is the only organized party in Jordan's parliament. All the other members of parliament (MPs) represent tribes, clans or regions.
"In this parliament there are no real political movements except the IAF," said Deputy Speaker Ali Abu al-Sukkar.
His view was endorsed by a well-placed Western diplomat: "The IAF is the only coherent party."
To avoid alienating Islamic sentiment, the monarchy has emphasized its religious credentials, including the royal family's descent from the Prophet Muhammad. It has encouraged moderation by giving Islamists a stake in the system (albeit that Jordan's parliament in practice has only limited powers) and by such steps as establishing Aal al-Bait University.
At the same time, it has used more direct methods to neutralise Islamists (and others) deemed to be beyond the political pale, justifying this to Western audiences since Sept. 11 as part of the "war on terrorism." The kingdom's key internal security agency, the General Intelligence Directorate (GID), stands accused of harassing, detaining and maltreating dissidents. It's a far cry from the brutalities of outright police states but the GID's excesses fit awkwardly with Jordan's carefully cultivated image as an oasis of tolerance and decency in a regional desert of political oppression.
"In all Third World countries, it's the mukhabarat [secret police] who exert control and we are one of those countries," said Abdul Majid Thnaibat, superindendent-general of the Muslim Brotherhood, although he conceded that Jordan was nevertheless "better than any other Arab country."
Elsewhere in the region, he explained, "the president is the head of a party, not the head of state. Here, the king is for everybody."
Asked early this year whether the regime's attitude towards democracy had improved in recent years, Shaikh Hamza Mansour, head of the IAF, declared: "No, it's worse."
He complained of "unceasing repression," inking this to the government's failure to resist anti-Islamic pressures from its key foreign backer, the US.
At grassroots level, Islamism remains easily the dominant political force in Jordan.
"In general, people here don't consider bin Laden's actions to be criminal, but acts of self-defense," said Abd as-Salam al-Fandi, Imam of the small Ahmad Bin Taimiyah Mosque in the village of Ba al-Jadid, 13km west of the capital, Amman.
"We [Muslims] don't attack. We just defend," he said.
He said Muslims deeply resented the West's support for Israel's dispossession of the Palestinians, its drive for hegemony and its appetite for the Islamic world's oil and other resources.
"The people hate the US for what it did and this makes them like bin Laden. An eye for an eye," he said.
Reflecting the majority view in Jordan, al-Fandi stressed: "It's not just a [conventional] fight over borders. The people believe that it's a fight to affirm the existence of Islam."
The extent to which Islamism gathers even more momentum in Jordan will depend on the West's readiness to respect regional sensibilities. The invasion of Iraq and US President George W. Bush's failure to bring peace between Israelis and Palestinians suggest that the hardline fundamentalist tide will continue to rise. Whether there will ultimately be a place for the moderation symbolized and fostered by Aal Al-Bait University remains to be seen.
Alan George is the author of Syria: Neither Bread Nor Freedom.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS