How would the US and European countries react if the heads of the American and European business associations in this country were appointed by Taiwan's government? Incredulity, unhappiness, objection and utter condemnation would be the expected reactions. This is exactly Taiwan's response to the fact that many senior executives at Taiwanese business associations in China are appointed by the Taiwan Affairs Office of China's State Council.
According to intelligence obtained by the government, there are 74 Taiwanese business associations in China. Each has at least one official from the Taiwan Affairs Office doubling as a vice chairperson. The secretaries-general of more than 90 percent of the associations also hail from the same office -- an indication that the organizations are under close surveillance by the Beijing authorities. They are Beijing's tools for controlling Taiwanese businesses.
The associations should have been a channel through which Taiwanese businesses cooperate with and take care of each other. They should reflect the interests and needs of those businesses. When a conflict arises between a Taiwanese business and the local government, the association should defend the business interests by appropriate means.
This is exactly the same rationale behind the annual white papers published by the American and European chambers of commerce in Taipei to criticize some of Taiwan's policies. Both the ruling and opposition parties accept such criticism with a tolerant attitude.
Taiwanese business associations in China not only could never publish such white papers, they are losing what little independence they had. Not only are they unable to reflect the opinions of their members, but they are becoming institutions for controlling what the Taiwanese companies say and do in China. This is about the same as planting the People's Liberation Army's political warfare units inside the associations. This is a unique situation not seen in other foreign business groups in China, or anywhere else.
Interference by Chinese officials is not something Taiwanese businesses want to see. But what can they do except kowtow? Even if many Taiwanese businesses want to express goodwill toward this country's government, they will refrain from doing so after considering China's possible response.
By controlling the business associations, Beijing can influence the opinions of the groups' members and push them to vote for its favorite candidates in next year's presidential election. Recently, the Liberty Times, our sister paper, reported that Taiwanese businesspeople attending an official function in China were handed invitations to a banquet hosted by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
In the long run, Beijing may use the associations to pressure Taiwan to accept direct links under the "one China" principle. The next step will be to squeeze all capital and technology out of Taiwan, thereby weakening the economy and leaving the country powerless to resist unification with China.
Unhappy as it is to see its businesspeople invest in a hostile neighboring country, Taiwan at best can only use the "no haste, be patient" policy and try to warn the businesses about the risks of investing in China. Beijing has crossed the line separating politics from business and is controlling Taiwanese business associations. The political and economic threat posed to Taiwan should not be underestimated. The government needs to lodge a strong complaint via the WTO. If China refuses to take its hands off the associations, the government should consider halting the planned indirect cargo flights as well as measures allowing China-based Taiwanese businesses to get listed in this country.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS