After the demonstration on Saturday in support of the commonsense move to change Taiwan's name to, well, Taiwan, pro-China so-called experts were quick to claim that the turnout for the rally marked some kind of maximum mobilization support for the pro-independence camp. This was of course ludicrous, as if pro-independence supporters numbered only the 150,000 who turned out on Saturday. Since we are not as stupid as these "experts" we will not suggest that the 7,000 who turned out yesterday exhausted the support for reunification and the maintenance of the absurd "Republic of China" title. We will, however, note, with thanks to the rally's organizers, that the two rallies appear to demonstrate that people having pro-Taiwan nationalist sentiments outnumber the pro-China reunificationists by 20 to one. Hoist by their own petard, the reunificationists have demonstrated by this show of weakness the size of the mandate for change in Taiwan. Thanks.
Saturday also saw the KMT formally endorse the pan-blue joint presidential election ticket. And this raises an issue of how seriously the DPP wants to win next year's election and to what degree it is prepared to use the flaws in Taiwan's legal and constitutional framework to get what it wants. For it should be remembered that at present it is not legal to field an election ticket with candidates from different parties. "Why on earth not?" ask civil libertarians. "Who cares?" we answer; the reason for this bizarre rule is lost in the history of KMT one-party hegemony. The point is that the pan-blue camp is relying on the law being changed.
Currently the necessary amendment to the Presidential Election and Recall Law is crawling through the legislature and there is little doubt that the blue camp, with its control of that body, will make sure that it is passed in time. But passage of a law does not guarantee it will be enacted. A law passed by the legislature can always be vetoed by the Cabinet. Such a veto can be overturned, but this requires the support of two thirds of the Legislative Yuan, a majority that the pan-blues cannot muster.
It thus lies in the power of the government to stop the pan-blue ticket in its tracks. We advise that they do so. This will not mean that the Lien-Soong pairing cannot run. But it would necessitate that the PFP and the KMT recombine into one party. This is something that the KMT is particularly unwilling to do. Having suffered a severe truncation of its wealth since it lost power and thus the ability to shamelessly manipulate the stock market, the last thing the KMT wants is to let the PFP's kleptomaniacs anywhere near its assets. We say tough luck, there's no honor amongst thieves.
We also say that the DPP should stop fantasizing about getting some KMT big shot -- they have their eye on party vice chairman Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) -- onto its own joint ticket. There is plenty of talent in the DPP to provide a capable vice presidential candidate should a change be needed. But when such a perfect opportunity for throwing a spanner in the works of the blue-camp campaign presents itself, the DPP should use it.
There will be the usual hypocritical squawks from the blue camp about undemocratic behavior. The answer to this is that the DPP legislative program for the past three years has centered on a number of issues that almost everyone in Taiwan wants, such as greater social welfare provision, legislation against corruption and the referendum law, and which the blue camp has shamelessly blocked out of pure self interest. Time for the blue camp to learn that others can act out of self interest too. And if this can derail the pan-blue election campaign, a victory for which would mean the end of Taiwan as we know it, it is in all our interests.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS