More than 100,000 people took to the streets yesterday to promote calling Taiwan "Taiwan" -- once again demonstrating Taiwan's active quest for democracy and its willingness to reflect on its past.
One important lesson to be learned from the fact that this demonstration could be carried out without a hitch is that Taiwan -- having lived through decades of democracy activism and completed many systemic reforms -- is entering the last and most difficult stage of democratic reform.
Taiwan has been under colonial rule for more than 400 years. Since 1895 it has had 50 years of Japanese rule and more than 40 years of colonial-style rule by the alien KMT. This has for a long time caused people to lack identification with the land and the nation.
This was the reason why former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) proposed the "self-awareness" (主體性) concept, prompting people to reflect on their national identity. The emergence of a specifically Taiwanese identity and its formalization in national institutions is the great reform Lee was unable to complete during his 12 years as the nation's leader.
Taiwan has its own military, territory and constitution. Its people can choose its legislators and president in direct and free elections. There is local self-rule, economic freedom and the rights of free speech and publication. There is an independent judiciary.
All these things meet the requirements of an independent, sovereign nation. Yet, internationally speaking, Taiwan is not a legal entity. When its citizens travel abroad they are asked where they are from and about the name of their country. The key to all these problems is Lee's unfinished final reform.
The significance of the movement to rectify the name of Taiwan does not lie in Taiwan's independence or unification with China. It is a movement to bring about self-awareness, urging the entire Taiwanese community to examine their common fate seriously. It is the ultimate and inescapable issue faced by everyone living on the island, whether they are indigenous peoples or mainlanders, Fukienese or Hakka. It may take a while before we can settle on a name we all agree on, yet we have to realize the disagreements and conflicts that exist between our country's name and the entity it represents.
Those whose families came from Fukien province want to change our country's name to Taiwan. Taiwan is, after all, where the vast majority of us live; the choice of name simply reflects this reality.
Those who oppose the campaign to call Taiwan Taiwan insist that the nation's official name is the Republic of China (ROC), despite that fact that Taiwan was not part of the ROC at its founding nor was sovereignty ever transferred to the ROC at a later date. The ROC name is in fact a symbol of Taiwan colonial tutelage. Since the colonial past cannot itself be defended, the excuse of those who oppose a name change is that it's too difficult for us to use "Taiwan" as the official name of the nation in light of today's international political situation. This logic has confused cause and effect. It's also a defeatist attitude cultivated by the KMT's rule over the past half century.
Rectifying the name of Taiwan is the beginning of the last phase of the nation's democratic reform. It is foreseeable that this mission will take much more energy and time. Although yesterday's march went off smoothly and peacefully, most participants were local senior Taiwanese from southern Taiwan -- showing that the nation's young generation is cool towards politics and has a weak national identity.
Demonstrations cannot solve these problems. We need to start from the root -- our educational system -- and allow our youth to get a clear picture of Taiwan's history and reflect on their relationship with this land.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS