The Hong Kong-based Oriental Daily News on Aug. 26 ran the following headline: "Lee Teng-hui has heart attack, undergoes surgery, pushing for Taiwan independence." It is no surprise that, under Beijing's "one country, two systems" formula, Hong Kong would treat the former president in this way.
But it's chilling to see that such a simple matter was politicized into a piece of news that smacked of schadenfreude.
Promoting Taiwan's independence and having a heart attack are two different matters. Apparently the daily committed a non sequitur in viewing "pushing for Tai-wan's independence" as the cause of the illness. There are plenty of reasons behind its attempt to tarnish independence movements. But this unwise act has exposed the cold-bloodedness and ruthlessness of the "Greater China" mind-set.
Lee Teng Hui's (李登輝) illness is of course not directly related to the 6 million people of Hong Kong. From the perspective of universal humanity, it's all right if they did not show any sympathy. But how come they took this opportunity to scoff at him?
What's even more deplorable is that not long ago, Taiwan Advocates, a think tank chaired by Lee, invited some Hong Kong friends to discuss the territory's future under the "one country, two systems" formula, as well as the prospects for autonomy and democracy in Hong Kong.
Even though the host and guests disagreed on certain mat-ters, such exchanges between Taiwan and Hong Kong are definitely beneficial. Surprisingly, the Hong Kong media still treated Lee in an unfriendly way and reported his illness in an indecorous manner.
This seems to show that the Hong Kong people's "democracy" cannot link to the Taiwanese people's "self-awareness" (discovery and construction of a Taiwanese entity). It also serves as a warning: too much expectation and fantasies about the so-called "three places across the Taiwan Strait" -- China, Hong Kong and Taiwan -- is not conducive to changing the status quo. Neither will it bring in surprise outcomes if one does not make all-out efforts to achieve one's goals and ideals.
God helps those who help themselves. It all depends on one's own sense of pride and dignity.
In addition, the various interpretations of what Lee said that, "the ROC [Republic of China] no longer exists," must be based on accepting the nation's status as a reality. Otherwise, the emotionally charged term "pushing for Taiwan's independence" will rapidly spread here, posing a threat to the 23 million Taiwanese people's national identity.
Never mind pro-unification or pro-independence factions. The one and only "Taiwanese faction" is the ultimate foundation on which we can stand and face the world. At least, we should recognize the reality and respect the land on which we were born and raised.
Obviously, Taiwan is "real" while the ROC is "fictional." At this historic crossroads, one who is willing to work for the community's common prosperity deserves people's respect.
Yeh Hai-yen is director of the department of philosophy at Soochow University.
Translated by Jackie Lin
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS