Beginning at 2pm on Aug. 17, the TV news kept on broadcasting news of KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and his wife, Lien Fang-yu (連方瑀) as they saw their daughter, Lien Yung-hsin (連詠心), off to her studies in the US. Frankly speaking, this is really troubling and also very surprising.
It is troubling because why would it concern the public that Lien's daughter is leaving the country? Wherein lies its newsworthiness? Is it necessary to broadcast the story over and over again?
It was surprising to see both the departing one and those seeing her off actually crying. Lien Yung-hsin was only going to the US to study, she did not leave never to come back, nor is she dying, joining the army or going to war. What was there to cry about?
Today's world is but a small place, and an overseas student can come and go several times over a year, particularly postgraduate research students. So what was there to cry about?
In the 1960s and 1970s, studying abroad was without a doubt a big thing for a family. At the time, Taiwan as a whole was like a big prison. Under the surveillance of the Chiangs, the people were no different from prisoners.
Gaining admission into a school didn't necessarily mean that one would be able to leave. Even if one managed to leave, family members would not necessarily be able to leave the country to go visit, not only due to economic reasons, but also because they wouldn't necessarily be able to get passports.
Many people felt free as birds once they got on the aircraft, and vowed never to return. Whether on the dock or at the airport, therefore, it was not very strange to see both the departing ones and those seeing them off crying.
Today, studying abroad is a common triviality, so why are the Liens and their daughter crying at the airport? Lien Fang-yu was even escorting her daughter to the US.
The only reason is that the Liens are a world unto themselves, completely unrelated to Taiwan's democratic progress and historic development. Lien Chan was born with a silver spoon in his mouth. His daughter will, of course, be even better off and you could even say that she was born with a gold spoon in her mouth.
The official career of Lien Chen-tung (連震東), Lien Chan's father, can of course not be compared to that of his son. Lien Chen-tung never reached any further than the ministerial level, where he amassed the huge family fortune.
Lien Chan went from minister to premier to vice president and his wealth does not compare unfavorably to and, in fact, even surpasses that of his father.
Lien Yung-hsin is therefore sure to be even more spoiled than Lien Chan. The result is this rare behavior of one of the richest families in modern Taiwanese history.
We can use PFP Chairman James Soong's (宋楚瑜) definition of "one country on each side" -- "the poor on one side, and the rich on the other" -- to describe the Lien family's crying together.
Soong, who owns at least five houses in the US, can of course modestly count himself a citizen of the "country of the rich."
Lien Chan's wealth is known by all and sundry, and he is definitely a citizen of the "country of the rich."
We can only imagine Lien Yung-hsin's spoiled upbringing. The ancients had a saying: "The child of a wealthy man will not stand below a high wall," not to mention travel far.
The Liens' crying tells us a lot.
Chin Heng-wei is editor-in-chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS