Beginning at 2pm on Aug. 17, the TV news kept on broadcasting news of KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and his wife, Lien Fang-yu (連方瑀) as they saw their daughter, Lien Yung-hsin (連詠心), off to her studies in the US. Frankly speaking, this is really troubling and also very surprising.
It is troubling because why would it concern the public that Lien's daughter is leaving the country? Wherein lies its newsworthiness? Is it necessary to broadcast the story over and over again?
It was surprising to see both the departing one and those seeing her off actually crying. Lien Yung-hsin was only going to the US to study, she did not leave never to come back, nor is she dying, joining the army or going to war. What was there to cry about?
Today's world is but a small place, and an overseas student can come and go several times over a year, particularly postgraduate research students. So what was there to cry about?
In the 1960s and 1970s, studying abroad was without a doubt a big thing for a family. At the time, Taiwan as a whole was like a big prison. Under the surveillance of the Chiangs, the people were no different from prisoners.
Gaining admission into a school didn't necessarily mean that one would be able to leave. Even if one managed to leave, family members would not necessarily be able to leave the country to go visit, not only due to economic reasons, but also because they wouldn't necessarily be able to get passports.
Many people felt free as birds once they got on the aircraft, and vowed never to return. Whether on the dock or at the airport, therefore, it was not very strange to see both the departing ones and those seeing them off crying.
Today, studying abroad is a common triviality, so why are the Liens and their daughter crying at the airport? Lien Fang-yu was even escorting her daughter to the US.
The only reason is that the Liens are a world unto themselves, completely unrelated to Taiwan's democratic progress and historic development. Lien Chan was born with a silver spoon in his mouth. His daughter will, of course, be even better off and you could even say that she was born with a gold spoon in her mouth.
The official career of Lien Chen-tung (連震東), Lien Chan's father, can of course not be compared to that of his son. Lien Chen-tung never reached any further than the ministerial level, where he amassed the huge family fortune.
Lien Chan went from minister to premier to vice president and his wealth does not compare unfavorably to and, in fact, even surpasses that of his father.
Lien Yung-hsin is therefore sure to be even more spoiled than Lien Chan. The result is this rare behavior of one of the richest families in modern Taiwanese history.
We can use PFP Chairman James Soong's (宋楚瑜) definition of "one country on each side" -- "the poor on one side, and the rich on the other" -- to describe the Lien family's crying together.
Soong, who owns at least five houses in the US, can of course modestly count himself a citizen of the "country of the rich."
Lien Chan's wealth is known by all and sundry, and he is definitely a citizen of the "country of the rich."
We can only imagine Lien Yung-hsin's spoiled upbringing. The ancients had a saying: "The child of a wealthy man will not stand below a high wall," not to mention travel far.
The Liens' crying tells us a lot.
Chin Heng-wei is editor-in-chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS