The US has first dibs
Among the recent heated discussions in Taiwan's media regarding whether the US has the right to oppose the referendum issues of Taiwan's independence and sovereignty, the US was accused by some pro-China groups of interfering with the internal affairs of Taiwan.
It is fitting to review how the US got involved with Taiwan, which might shed some light on trying to find the best solution for this explosive issue.
Contrary to the KMT's deceitful claims and teaching to the people of Taiwan for the last five decades that their troops liberated the island, it was US troops -- on behalf of the allied forces -- which liberated Tai-wan from Japanese occupation at the end of World War II.
As occurred with many Pacific Islands liberated by US forces, the US was accorded custodial rights and obligations pending the final solution of the sovereignty of Taiwan -- even though the US allowed the KMT's troops to occupy the island after the war.
China's claim of sovereignty over Taiwan is equally deceit-ful. If China's claim to Taiwan today is believable, then the Republic of Mongolia has every right to claim China as its lost territory because China was only one of Mongolia's provinces during the Mongol Empire in the 13th century.
Judging from China's staunch support of the US' enemies during the Korean and Vietnam wars and Beijing's assisting North Korea, Pakistan and Iran with nuclear armaments, a future conflict between the US and China is inevitable.
The possibility that some politicians in Taiwan might exploit the referendum issue for personal gains and China's feverish ambition to take Taiwan at any cost make it imperative that the US proclaim its sovereign right to Taiwan -- which, under international law, it could claim given the liberation of Taiwan by US forces.
It is high time that Washington informs Beijing in no uncertain terms that the US' "one China" policy has never implied or recognized China's sovereign right to Taiwan.
Washington's voicing of its concerns regarding a referendum on Taiwan's independence and sovereignty is a step in the right direction.
The US should move further to declare and assert its custodial right to the sovereignty of Taiwan so that there will be no misunderstanding on the part of the people and governments on either side of the Taiwan Strait.
Our foundation promotes Taiwan joining the US as a commonwealth -- through a US-sponsored referendum in Taiwan -- in order to preserve the democracy in Taiwan and to strengthen the US' national defense capability in the Pacific region. Our foundation's proposal offers the best solution to the Taiwan issue.
Arthur Li
Founder, USA-Taiwan Commonwealth Foundation
Florida
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS