According to a recent Pentagon report, the number of Chinese short-range ballistic missiles aimed at Taiwan has now increased to 450. The report also estimates the number of missiles will increase by 75 per year over the next few years. This is a 50 percent increase from earlier growth estimates by the US. The report also warns that unless Taipei undertakes the necessary improvements to its military power, China will have the capability to rapidly destroy this nation's airfields within the next few years. It will also be able to use short-range ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, special forces and other military power to rapidly undermine Taiwan's ground, air defense, and command and control facilities.
The content of the report was no surprise because China's military ambitions have always been obvious. What's worrying is that Taiwan's military preparedness has been declining quickly due to the sluggish economy and the relaxation of psychological defenses caused by cross-strait interactions.
One possible strategy of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) would be to launch a fierce surprise attack featuring information warfare, air raids, missile attacks, a naval blockade and amphibious and airborne blitzes that will target key strategic areas, causing massive destruction and thereby forcing Taipei to surrender. Beijing could also gradually turn up the military heat on Taiwan, forcing this nation's leaders to adopt policies that are in China's interest. China's military buildup is not only aimed at Taiwan but is also meant to fight forces from the US or other countries that may emerge. Beijing may adopt asymmetrical tactics to put US aircraft carrier fleets coming to Taiwan's help into a complicated war situation. China is a solid threat to both Taiwan and the US.
What is even more difficult to guard against than the PLA's rising military might is China's attempts to unravel Taiwan's national will and to block US intervention in cross-strait issues by diplomatic and other non-military means. Now that the US needs Beijing to influence North Korea regarding Pyongyang's nuclear program, it could become more aloof to the Taiwan issue. This could set the stage for China to force Taiwan to the negotiating table under terms favorable to Beijing. This is what Taipei must guard against first and foremost.
The increasing trade and economic exchanges across the Taiwan Strait are the most damaging to the nation's psychological defense. After moving their companies and money to China, many Taiwanese businesspeople have become Beijing's spokespersons, demanding direct links and supporting the "one China" principle. Hong Kong's fate since its handover to Beijing gives us a glimpse into the gradual-invasion model, which is harder to guard against than a military invasion. Only after seeing what was meant to be included in the territory's national security bill, also known as Article 23 legislation, did the people of Hong Kong realize that "one country, two systems" is a sugar-coated poison pill. Even a demonstration by 500,000 people against the proposed legislation not be able to salvage the interests of the people in the territory.
As long as China does not renounce the use of force against Taiwan, it will be the nation's biggest security threat. Taiwan will be forced to adopt a defensive "porcupine" response. The Pentagon report is a timely warning both to Taiwanese and Americans that they cannot afford to let down their guard against Beijing's threat.
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS