Earlier this month, the North Korean government said it had completed the reprocessing of 8,000 used nuclear fuel rods, hinting that it already had the ability to produce nuclear weapons. The statement returned the North Korea nuclear crisis to the international spotlight. Pyong-yang's nuclear threats are aimed at gaining economic aid and diplomatic recognition from the US, as well as a non-aggression treaty. Pyongyang's aggressive attempt to seek interaction with the US has put China in a rather embarrassing position.China is now playing a far more active role in the North Korean crisis than it did in the past.
On July 1, Chinese Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) visited the US and discussed North Korea with US officials. Earlier in the month, South Korean President Roh Moo-hyun visited China and North Korea was the foremost issue on his visit. After the crisis escalated in mid-July, Foreign Minister Li Zhaoxing (李肇星) spoke to US Secretary of State Colin Powell by telephone and exchanged views. On July 17, China's other Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs Dai Bingguo (戴秉國) began a visit to the US, during which he met with Powell, Vice President Dick Cheney and National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice. Dai had earlier visited Pyongyang and handed over a letter written by President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) to North Korean leader Kim Jung-il.
Following China's vigorous coordination, Kim no longer insists on opposing the multilateral talks proposed by the US.
The North Korea issue has gone through many twists and turns, but Beijing's action has been the most vigorous this time. I believe it has to do with the new diplomacy thinking and strategy of the new leadership headed by Hu and Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶). Former president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) attached more importance to relations with the leading powers and his own image as the leader of a big nation on the international stage. Guided by such thinking, Sino-US relations became an overriding, all-important consideration in China's diplomatic strategy. Regional politics were neglected in comparison.
However, the first country Hu visited after taking office was not the US. Instead, he went to Russia and Europe. This demonstrated an adjustment in China's diplomatic thinking. The fact that Li is a former ambassador to the US explains the high level of importance still attached to Sino-American relations.
In reality, however, Dai is the primary implementer of China's diplomatic policy. He previously headed the Chinese Communist Party's international liaison department. The focus of his work has always been relations with neighboring countries.
One can see a hint of the new thinking here. China has not only taken vigorous action on the North Korea issue, but has also strength-ened the country's role in regional politics. Beijing has also joined hands with ASEAN. China's new thinking will focus on cultivating its influence in regional politics in order to gain leverage in international relations, thereby forcing the US to cooperate with Beijing instead of passively seeking such cooperation.
In the US, President George W. Bush's hardline diplomatic policies are now under suspicion. He is anxious to resolve the North Korea issue diplomatically in order to reduce his troubles. This has provided China with a perfect opportunity to put its new diplomatic approach to use.
Diplomacy is not one of Hu's strong points. We have seen his rigid appearance before other state leaders at the G8 summit. He would rather maintain a low personal profile on the international stage and put his effort into seeking regional hegemony. Whether such an adjustment will be effective remains to be seen.
Wang Dan was a student leader during the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations.
Translated by Francis Huang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS