In preparation for next year's presidential election, the DPP has decided its campaign strategy: drawing a battle line between the pro-reform and anti-reform sides. With this strategy, the DPP can advance or retreat freely, while pushing the pan-blue camp into a defensive position.
Viewed from an offensive perspective, the DPP can emphasize its efforts to boost the economy and enact a referendum law (
Judging from the overall situation, I believe that the momentum of the KMT-PFP alliance has weakened -- because the alliance has repeatedly failed to dominate political issues. Plus, due to the unhappy marriage of the two political parties, the possibility of a split has gradually emerged in the pan-blue camp.
The blue camp's campaign strategy mostly focuses on creating the false impression of a united KMT-PFP alliance. This thinking is shaped by historical factors, as the two parties believe that the DPP will have no chance to win if they do not split apart. As a result, the blue camp is making all efforts to pretend to be united. Naturally, such unity is a hardship, because both the KMT and the PFP clearly know that the basis for unity does not exist.
The cooperation between KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
Indeed, the split of the blue camp before the 2000 presidential election three years ago was crucial to the DPP's victory. However, there were many other reasons that contributed to the victory, among which the DPP's reform promises were a key to its success. The DPP has been flexible and vigorous at all times, and marched forward in line with the dynamic of the entire society. Besides, the DPP does not have the baggage of any party-run businesses, and it's incapable of moving money from state coffers to itself -- not to mention that it has no record of corruption. What deserves our attention is that the DPP has repeatedly proposed new reform issues recently. Such reform issues echo the drastic changes of society.
Historically, the blue camp is hardly able to confidently say it can satisfy people's demand for reform. Both Lien and Soong are merely playing the role of political commentators. The establishment of the KMT-PFP alliance has shown that it's more suitable for the blue camp to remain in opposition. Since the outward appearance (Lien) of the alliance does not correspond with the inner (Soong), it has failed to dominate political issues. It seems to me that the pan-blue camp is doomed to be led by the pan-green camp.
Chen Fang-ming is a professor in the department of Chinese literature at National Chengchi University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS