China's official English newspaper, the China Daily, and Xinhua News Agency reported on July 19 that Wang Zaixi (王在希), deputy director of the Tai-wan Affairs Office of China's State Council, officially pro-
posed an agreement resembling a free-trade agreement (FTA) to Taiwan and called for both sides of the Taiwan Strait to quickly set up a mechanism for economic cooperation.
Why is China proposing an FTA with Taipei at this point in time? Not long ago China warned the US and Japan that it opposed any country signing an FTA with Taipei. Is it possible that Chinese leaders have come around to recognize our sovereignty and want to sign an agreement with us on an equal basis?
Of course not. If the people of Taiwan can cast aside the "Greater China" ideology, we will immediately understand China's evil plan to bait Taiwanese businesspeople and compel them to destroy President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) policy against direct transportation links under the "one China" principle.
Beijing's unification trick is indeed quite clever. If you don't fall into the trap of direct transportation links under the "one China" principle, Beijing will get you hooked by offering lures that make you lose reason and resistance. China will also beat drums and strike gongs around you to make you fall into its trap to be slaughtered.
For example, former premier Zhu Rongji's (朱鎔基) ASEAN plus China summit plan in 2001 and the subsequent ASEAN plus three summit plan both highlighted Taiwan's exclusion and tried to make us feel that Taiwan would be marginalized if it did not unify with China as soon as possible. This was effective at the time. Some economic think tanks even followed in the footsteps of those people who use commercial affairs to promote unification. They advocated direct transportation links and argued that Taiwan should integrate with China economically as soon as possible in order to make China a central region for Taiwan and enable it to march into east Asian markets.
Fortunately, China's beating of drums and gongs did not succeed because of our country's persistence in acting in a rational man-ner. The people also gradually understood through rational analysis that the negative impact of direct transportation links on the overall economy is far greater than the convenience and profit gained by the business enterprises and individuals. When he met with foreign reporters earlier this month, Chen said he objected to direct transportation links under the "one China" principle. It was a setback for Beijing's policy to absorb Taiwan economically.
The proposal of a quasi-FTA is an attempt by China to cope with the new situation. Most likely Beijing's objective is to use actual benefits and incentives to enhance the trick of using commerce to attack the government from all sides and support the unificationists forces in this country
Would signing an FTA with China be advantageous? No. Would signing an FTA with the US or Japan be advantageous? Yes. Any FTA between Taiwan and its trading partners would be advantageous to the long-term development of the nation's economy -- except for an FTA with China.
The reason China is the exception is the two economic systems of China and Taiwan use the same language and that there is a wide difference in the size of their populations and territory. Under these objective conditions in geography and culture, the more convenient the cross-strait traffic becomes, the more the two economies become integrated.
According to the market principle, the capital, technology and talented personnel of the small economy will gradually move toward the center of the big economy. The economic vitality of the small economy will decline until it becomes marginalized. An FTA and direct-transportation links will both speed up the marginalization process of the small economy. The Penghu economy and the Taiwan mainland economy (one small economy and one big economy, same language) during the past 50 years, as well as Hong Kong after 1997, are proof of this thesis.
Signing an FTA is similar to direct-transportation links, which is advantageous to some business enterprises but disadvantageous to the country's overall economy in the long term. Both a quasi-FTA and direct-transportation links are just strategies aimed at making Taiwan quench its thirst with poisoned drinks. Both carry political objectives of declaring the relations between Taiwan and China to be "domestic relations" and therefore China's internal affair.
If some of us believe China's proposals can possibly be considered and discussed, or we do not have to reject Beijing's proposals on purpose, we are already taken in. Beijing knows that this is a major election issue which can help it confound right and wrong, entice the Taiwanese people and serve its own strategy. Our people and government should not be careless.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy advisor to the president.
Translated by Grace Shaw
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS