On Tuesday, the World Health Organization (WHO)rejected the government's request that Taiwan be removed from its travel advisory list. The WHO's rejection is not only a major blow to the nation's health care workers, but a big frustration for the general public. The application was presented in strict accordance with the standards by which Hong Kong was removed from the WHO's list on May 23. Taiwan has not done any worse than Hong Kong and Guangdong Province in SARS prevention, but it has received different treatment from the WHO. This has led to accusations of Chinese political interference.
Officials from the Department of Health had expressed optimism about the nation's prospects for being removed from the travel advisory because the number of probable cases and deaths this month were low enough for Taiwan to qualify. The government has established standard procedures at hospitals and the epidemic had been brought under control. Even though there was a SARS outbreak at Taipei Municipal Yangming Hospital after the application was filed, the sources of infection were immediately isolated.
Even though Taiwan reported six probable cases on June 10, six of the people displayed symptoms that were not typical of SARS and not all of them tested positive on polymerase-chain-reaction tests. But the government has respected the judgment of medical professionals and honestly listed them as probable cases. The nation's performance has won praise from WHO experts conducting field inspections here and they were astonished by the rejection of the application.
Some have attributed the rejection to media reports that Taiwan may have exported SARS cases to Germany, Thailand and Brazil. But these reports have proven largely to be untrue. These are flimsy reasons for rejecting Taiwan's application -- if they were actually used as reasons.
China's interference in the WHO's operations is nothing new. During this year's World Health Assembly, Chinese Vice Premier Wu Yi (
Rumors have long circulated that Beijing has pressured the WHO not to remove Taiwan from its list before it takes China off the list. The fact that Taiwan was rejected despite its good prospects has reinforced speculation that political considerations are overriding professional judgment at the WHO.
Taiwan has tried to join the WHO in the belief that it is a professional organization that values medical expertise and human rights. If the rumors about China's interference in the WHO are true, and if the agency is kowtowing to political pressure in violation of its own principles, then Taiwan should not be so eager to join it.
But that does not mean there is no need for improvement in the nation's epidemic-prevention measures. We can see from the cluster infections at Yangming Hospital that Taiwan still isn't doing well enough.
Taiwan's eventual goal is not merely to be removed from the travel advisory, but to eradicate SARS entirely. The failure to get off the WHO's travel advisory list is a warning that the nation must not lower its guard. Constant alert and effort are as
necessary as ever. Just one lapse and SARS may make a comeback.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS