On Friday May 23 the UN barred Andrew Hsia(
Eleventh-hour strong-arm tactics by China pressured UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan. Beijing spearheaded this incident as part of its ongoing campaign against international recognition of Taiwan as an independent sovereign nation.
Thus far, much of the criticism of China and the UN has focused on the issues of Taiwan's freedom of access to the UN and the freedom of the UNCA to invite whomever it wishes.
Equally as important, given that much of the briefing would have concerned the SARS situation in Taiwan, the UN should have been much more supportive of the scheduled event, which it had previously approved.
Given that the SARS epidemic originated in China, Beijing should be much more sensitive. It is one thing to oppose Taiwan's bid for member ship in the WHA. It is quite another matter to interfere with efforts to communicate about SARS.
Both China and the UN shirked their responsibilities to the global community, China by pressuring the UN, the UN by yielding to the pressure. Both the UN and the Chinese government should be ashamed of such behavior. Both owe Taiwan and the international community at large a public apology.
China's actions exhibit a bitter immaturity that should not be tolerated by the UN or by the international community at large. It is bad enough that the lack of transparency on the part of the Chinese government contributed to the global spread of the SARS virus. It is inexcusable to follow up such questionable behavior with actions that interfere with attempts to communicate progress and ongoing conditions related to the SARS epidemic.
China's government should not have been surprised when Taiwan rejected its offer to send personnel and supplies to help Taiwan battle SARS. The action appears to be a case of "too little too late," and far short of the apology that the international community and the people of Taiwan deserve.
George Thompson is an assistant professor in the Department of Applied Foreign Languages at Kai Nan University in Taoyuan.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS