The all out war on SARS has been going on for more than a month. In this bitter battle, which we must not lose, the mass media's capability to fight together has already become the focus of attention of both government and the public. A comprehensive view of the situation shows that the question of whether the news media will be able to play a more central role in this war is crucial to the eventual success of these prevention efforts.
From the beginning of the prevention effort until today, the news media have, just like frontline medical staff, played a crucial role as frontline observers reporting the situation and integrating the opinions of agencies participating in the battle and in the logistics and support efforts. Their hard work and the dangers they face cannot be appreciated by outsiders.
Many people may not yet be aware of the fact that many of the "war zone" journalists hunting SARS stories have been unable to return to their homes or offices, and they still don't know how long this quarantine will last. When we discuss the quality of SARS reporting, it would only be right to first applaud and encourage the mass media.
Hard though it may be, it is still necessary to discuss the media's performance in handling SARS news.
First, some reports on SARS have been trying too hard to find drama in the news. For example, the tragic individual stories of the medical staff that have died while on duty have been constantly and widely reported. By comparison, the media aren't particularly interested in a comprehensive debate about whether medical resources have been put to proper use in the battle to rein in the epidemic.
Another example: while the responsibility for the Hoping Hospital fiasco around the time it was being sealed off has not yet been clarified, several reports have already adopted dramatic methods, describing certain people as having ulterior motives and playing a negative role, or as being upright heroes saving peoples' lives.
They have not, however, been able to discuss the systemic aspects of the chaos in the command system and the lack of fighting experience that was so suddenly exposed after Hoping Hospital was sealed off. Similarly, several reports have described the incongruous opinions of the central and local governments as a highly dramatic conflict, but they have not been able to systematically report how the prevention efforts of central and local governments could be integrated or submit a set of effective suggestions.
Second, the media have spent a lot of time on daily follow-ups on the status of the epidemic, but they have failed to produce a series of reports discussing how to effectively contain the epidemic from a comprehensive systemic aspect. Hence, we can see daily fragmentary reports focusing on where the epidemic has occurred, but we cannot rely on the media to supervise and follow the development of each planned measure for fighting the epidemic.
In other words, so-called SARS news shouldn't merely tell the public where new suspected cases have occurred. They should follow the whole issue, monitoring daily whether each preventive measure that should be implemented by the government or the public is being implemented.
Third, when reporting on SARS, the media should of course pay particular attention to the veracity of information. As part of the epidemic-prevention system, the media should perform the final check on information. Even though some of the information is coming from government officials, it isn't necessarily correct.
In a quest for correctness, the media should take the initiative to verify information each time there is a big news story. They shouldn't think they are free from responsibility just because the erroneous information came from an official. The media are an intelligence unit within the epidemic-prevention system, and they should be particularly cautious when it comes to the evaluation of any important information.
At a time when the people of this nation are participating in the epidemic-prevention battle, the media cannot be mere bystanders. On the contrary, they should place themselves at the center of the battle to prevent the epidemic and help the government and the people win this bitter war through cool reasoning and insightful views.
Hu Yu-wei is a professor in the Graduate Institute of Mass Communication at National Taiwan Normal University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS