Taiwan felt indignation and outrage over Beijing's demeaning treatment of it at the World Health Assembly (WHA) last Monday, then the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait indicated to the Straits Exchange Foundation that it was willing to donate medical supplies to help this country's battle against SARS, including 200,000 pieces of protective clothing, 100,000 N95 masks and five ambulances with quarantine capability. The move of course immediately invited a lot of discussions and mixed feelings, but mostly disgust .
No one would be naive enough to think there is any noble or even half-decent intention behind Beijing's move. The Chinese leaders can't possibly be trying to ease the injured feelings of Taiwanese, since the issue apparently has never graced their minds before. For example, while Beijing's opposition to Taiwan gaining observer status at the World Health Organization (WHO) was predictable, it could have at least handled the matter more sensitively, such as focusing on under-the-table persuasion, in view of the serious outbreak of SARS here.
But repeatedly on public occasions, even at the WHA meeting, Chinese Vice Premier Wu Yi (
Then on Friday, as a result of Chinese pressure, the director-general of the Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in New York was literally blocked from the doors of the UN headquarters after he was invited by the UN Correspondents Association to brief it on Taiwan's efforts to join the WHO and fight SARS.
Beijing is not trying to help Taiwan -- just the opposite in fact. If it really wanted to help, it would not have objected to Taiwan gaining WHO observer status. Whatever assistance it has offered is too little and much too late. The third peak of infections here is estimated to be coming under control and Center for Disease Control Director Su Yi-jen (
Under the circumstances, if the government accepts China's "offer of help," it will have to pay a heavy price. First, Beijing will probably try to take credit for bringing the epidemic here under control. Second, accepting the donation would be a concession to Beijing's lies -- that Taiwan has no need to join the WHO, because it is receiving sufficient help from China as a "province."
The government should show a little spine and say no thank you to China's offer. Or tell the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait to donate the material -- via a non-governmental organization such as the International Red Cross -- directly to hospitals. After all, any foreign government or individual can make such a donation. If Beijing thinks it that channel is too insulting, that is just too bad.
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS