Once again Taiwan's bid to become an observer to the World Health Organization (WHO) has failed to make it onto the World Health Assembly's agenda -- despite the SARS epidemic here and Beijing's unconscionable cover-up of its own SARS problem. The message to the people of Taiwan is that whenever this nation is faced with a future epidemic, they shouldn't hold their breath waiting for help from the WHO.
How could a supposedly lofty organization such as the WHO continue to allow outdated political considerations to override the right of millions of people in this country to proper health care -- especially since such a move places the health of billions more around the world at risk? WHO members must make a conscientious choice based on professional medical knowledge, instead of blindly handing over the responsibility of caring for the people of Taiwan to Beijing's bloodied hands.
Political considerations aside, the decision was clearly mistaken from a health-care point of view. After all, the quality of medical services in China is far behind that of Taiwan -- something WHO officials know very well. So how could a medically more advanced region be "well in the care" of one with lower medical standards?
Epidemiologists worldwide agree that many epidemics affecting China and the rest of Asia originate from southern China, a region with a high population density, warm, humid weather and the close cohabitation of human beings and animals. Taiwanese species often have no resistance against the diseases coming from China, as shown by the foot-and-mouth disease outbreak in March 1997 that decimated the domestic hog industry.
Now an epidemic that originated in Guangdong Province is killing people and wreaking havoc in Taiwan -- as it has in Hong Kong, Singapore, Toronto, Beijing and many other places.
The fact that Taiwan needs help from the WHO is beyond doubt. According to reports from Taiwanese medical experts, one of the major causes behind the recent hospital outbreaks of SARS is that the virus often hides under the cover of chronic diseases such as gall bladder inflammation, kidney problems and heart disease. Due to the lack of experience in treating SARS, many doctors have misdiagnosed patients.
The WHO extended its help to Singapore within days of the first reports of SARS there. It took more than six weeks for it to send a small team here. If the WHO had sent more personnel and sufficient help in the early phases of the outbreak to help with case detection, doctors might have detected hidden SARS cases sooner. Taiwan might not have had to learn the lesson at such a terrible price.
The hospital outbreaks at National Taiwan University and Mackay Memorial Hospital in Taipei, as well as Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Kaohsiung, were the result of misdiagnosis.
The WHO has rejected Taiwan for the seventh time, but that does not mean the people of this nation should give up. Perhaps the people should follow President Chen Shui-bian's (
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS