Once again Taiwan's bid to become an observer to the World Health Organization (WHO) has failed to make it onto the World Health Assembly's agenda -- despite the SARS epidemic here and Beijing's unconscionable cover-up of its own SARS problem. The message to the people of Taiwan is that whenever this nation is faced with a future epidemic, they shouldn't hold their breath waiting for help from the WHO.
How could a supposedly lofty organization such as the WHO continue to allow outdated political considerations to override the right of millions of people in this country to proper health care -- especially since such a move places the health of billions more around the world at risk? WHO members must make a conscientious choice based on professional medical knowledge, instead of blindly handing over the responsibility of caring for the people of Taiwan to Beijing's bloodied hands.
Political considerations aside, the decision was clearly mistaken from a health-care point of view. After all, the quality of medical services in China is far behind that of Taiwan -- something WHO officials know very well. So how could a medically more advanced region be "well in the care" of one with lower medical standards?
Epidemiologists worldwide agree that many epidemics affecting China and the rest of Asia originate from southern China, a region with a high population density, warm, humid weather and the close cohabitation of human beings and animals. Taiwanese species often have no resistance against the diseases coming from China, as shown by the foot-and-mouth disease outbreak in March 1997 that decimated the domestic hog industry.
Now an epidemic that originated in Guangdong Province is killing people and wreaking havoc in Taiwan -- as it has in Hong Kong, Singapore, Toronto, Beijing and many other places.
The fact that Taiwan needs help from the WHO is beyond doubt. According to reports from Taiwanese medical experts, one of the major causes behind the recent hospital outbreaks of SARS is that the virus often hides under the cover of chronic diseases such as gall bladder inflammation, kidney problems and heart disease. Due to the lack of experience in treating SARS, many doctors have misdiagnosed patients.
The WHO extended its help to Singapore within days of the first reports of SARS there. It took more than six weeks for it to send a small team here. If the WHO had sent more personnel and sufficient help in the early phases of the outbreak to help with case detection, doctors might have detected hidden SARS cases sooner. Taiwan might not have had to learn the lesson at such a terrible price.
The hospital outbreaks at National Taiwan University and Mackay Memorial Hospital in Taipei, as well as Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Kaohsiung, were the result of misdiagnosis.
The WHO has rejected Taiwan for the seventh time, but that does not mean the people of this nation should give up. Perhaps the people should follow President Chen Shui-bian's (
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS