A march originally scheduled for yesterday to promote a name change for Taiwan was rescheduled for September due to the SARS epidemic. However, Taiwan's continuing exclusion from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the difficulty of containing the SARS outbreak have once again highlighted China's thuggish political maneuvers against this country -- and why Taiwan needs a name change.
To break through China's diplomatic blockade and push for the country's participation in international organizations, President Chen Shui-bian (
Unfortunately, despite its efforts Taiwan has not overcome the prevailing hegemonic and self-
interested attitudes in international politics. Year after year, the question of Taiwan's observership has been excluded from the agenda of World Health Assembly meetings.
This year's WHA meeting is scheduled for May 19. Over the past month, the international media as well as the legislatures in the US, Japan and Europe have publicly stressed the importance of letting this country into the WHO. In an article published in the Washington Post last Friday, Chen stressed that the international community should not exclude Taiwan from the WHO because this is not only against the spirit of humanitarianism but can also create a loophole in the global health care network, thereby endangering the entire world.
It is unfortunate that the Chinese leadership in the Zhongnanhai is still unable to understand how it is letting down the Taiwanese people at this crucial moment, as they have done so many times in the past. Just when Taiwan urgently needs help from the international community, Beijing's leaders continue to spout the "one China principle" and do whatever they can to block this nation's entry into the WHO.
The "one China" discourse has always been the foundation of Beijing's diplomatic blockade against Taiwan. The government certainly will not vie with Beijing for the right to represent "China." Speaking at a fundraising event last month, former president Lee Teng-hui (
But the name-change movement is not something that can yield results in the short term. The DPP government is already pushing for some changes, such as adding the word "Taiwan" to passport covers and changing the names of the nation's representative offices overseas. But these are merely tactical moves. To win support from other countries in the diplomatic arena, Taiwan needs strategic thinking.
To join international organizations, the government needs to emerge from the "one China" rut and use "Taiwan" as its name. Only by pushing for a name change can the country build itself as a polity and thereby establish a national identity.
Joining the WHO under the name "Taiwan" this year is unlikely -- but there should be no let-up in the push for a name change. The people should have no doubt that Taiwan is the name of our country.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS