Due to relentless attacks from the international media, President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) and Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) have finally spoken out and demanded an investigation into the cover-up of China's SARS epidemic. Former minister of health Zhang Wenkang (張文康) and Beijing mayor Meng Xuenong (孟學農) became the first high-ranking political casualties of the epidemic when they were sacked for their handling of the outbreak. Subsequently, when questioned by reporters about the true state of affairs, Vice Minister of Health Gao Qiang (高強) gave an intriguing response: "What can I do to make you believe me?"
The late historian Ray Huang (
He concluded that "rapidly establishing a mechanism for mathematical management" would be the key to China's modernization. Numerous academics and experts have in recent years expressed their lack of confidence in China's economic data. They believe Beijing's deceptive or sleight-of-hand models of financial practice are merely postponing a financial crisis.
Even today, despite its enormous size, China is still unable to establish a mechanism for mathematical management.
Now the spread of SARS has highlighted this problem just when China is hoping to become a more integral part of the world community. Political reform is a challenge that can't be dodged. But first it is important to clarify why Zhang and Meng covered up the epidemic, for two reasons.
First, the cries for reform heard after the Third Plenum of the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) 11th Central Committee in December 1978 have already been replaced by the belief that "stability is of paramount importance." Of course, during the CCP's 16th National Congress, as well as the 10th National People's Congress and the 10th Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference in March, it was taboo to rock the boat in any way, but the original desire to cover up the epidemic arose from the fear that reporting on it would cause panic.
But the Internet and cellphone text messaging are too highly developed for such secrecy to be maintained. Thus covering up the epidemic for the sake of stability backfired and gave rise to even greater dissatisfaction and widespread panic.
Second, China remains unable to implement "mathematical management." Neither Hu, Wen nor the general public know what the real statistics are. They couldn't announce them if they wanted to.
These two reasons show that the cover-up was a kind of structurally inevitable reaction.
Another difficulty faced by the CCP is that the urgency of political reform has once again been nakedly revealed. No doubt Meng and Zhang were simply scapegoats, but this action inevitably appeared to the public as an attempt to posture as a "highly capable government" to salvage some credibility. However, many problems that have arisen in the course of economic reforms all involve politics. If no attempt is made to solve them, these problems will continue to arise repeatedly.
For example, everyone is watching to see the drama unfolding around Guangdong Governor Huang Huahua (黃華華). Huang's enormous power derives from Beijing because the establishment of the echelon succession system put in place mandatory retirement age limits for officials of every rank. As Guangdong is a large province, the possibility for officials there to be promoted into the ranks of the central government is relatively great, and in the wrangling between the central and local governments, few officials are willing to insist on local interests and give up the possibility of promotion.
Rare figures with the courage to resist, such as a former governor of the province, Ye Xuanping (
In 1768, an incident similar to the current epidemic took place in China. Rumors of sorcery in the form of "soulstealers" spread from southern China along the length of the Yangtze River and the Grand Canal. In approximately six months a national panic had arisen out of nothing and influenced the lives of 200 million people in 12 provinces. Only after the Qing court intervened to quell the rumors did they begin to die down.
In those days China had no Internet or text-messaging services. Information travelled far less easily than it does today. With great effort the rumors were suppressed by the court, only to emerge again on a smaller scale in 1810 and 1876.
Of course, SARS is real and "soulstealers" were only the stuff of hearsay. SARS is a product of modern China; "soulstealers" were more of a classical phenomenon. So the analogy is a bit of a stretch, but in terms of the government's ability to bring these situations under control, it is worth noting that a more powerful government machine is offset by the increased ease with which rumors are now transmitted.
Mathematically unmanageable China has once again encoun-tered the same problems that have plagued it for centuries. Its rulers want political stability, yet they can't come up with accurate statistical data. The structure of the official establishment does not permit open resistance to those at the highest levels or in the center. As a result, cover-ups are the only option.
In this way, many people's criticism of China for covering up the epidemic and putting people's lives at risk and claims that not making public the data on SARS is "not a matter of inability, but rather a matter of unwillingness" must be re-evaluated.
In fact, China's behavior is best summed up as precisely "a matter of inability," which is what Gao Qiang implied with his clever response.
Lee Tuo-tzu is a graduate student in the Graduate Institute of National Development at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Ethan Harkness
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS