Due to relentless attacks from the international media, President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) and Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) have finally spoken out and demanded an investigation into the cover-up of China's SARS epidemic. Former minister of health Zhang Wenkang (張文康) and Beijing mayor Meng Xuenong (孟學農) became the first high-ranking political casualties of the epidemic when they were sacked for their handling of the outbreak. Subsequently, when questioned by reporters about the true state of affairs, Vice Minister of Health Gao Qiang (高強) gave an intriguing response: "What can I do to make you believe me?"
The late historian Ray Huang (
He concluded that "rapidly establishing a mechanism for mathematical management" would be the key to China's modernization. Numerous academics and experts have in recent years expressed their lack of confidence in China's economic data. They believe Beijing's deceptive or sleight-of-hand models of financial practice are merely postponing a financial crisis.
Even today, despite its enormous size, China is still unable to establish a mechanism for mathematical management.
Now the spread of SARS has highlighted this problem just when China is hoping to become a more integral part of the world community. Political reform is a challenge that can't be dodged. But first it is important to clarify why Zhang and Meng covered up the epidemic, for two reasons.
First, the cries for reform heard after the Third Plenum of the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) 11th Central Committee in December 1978 have already been replaced by the belief that "stability is of paramount importance." Of course, during the CCP's 16th National Congress, as well as the 10th National People's Congress and the 10th Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference in March, it was taboo to rock the boat in any way, but the original desire to cover up the epidemic arose from the fear that reporting on it would cause panic.
But the Internet and cellphone text messaging are too highly developed for such secrecy to be maintained. Thus covering up the epidemic for the sake of stability backfired and gave rise to even greater dissatisfaction and widespread panic.
Second, China remains unable to implement "mathematical management." Neither Hu, Wen nor the general public know what the real statistics are. They couldn't announce them if they wanted to.
These two reasons show that the cover-up was a kind of structurally inevitable reaction.
Another difficulty faced by the CCP is that the urgency of political reform has once again been nakedly revealed. No doubt Meng and Zhang were simply scapegoats, but this action inevitably appeared to the public as an attempt to posture as a "highly capable government" to salvage some credibility. However, many problems that have arisen in the course of economic reforms all involve politics. If no attempt is made to solve them, these problems will continue to arise repeatedly.
For example, everyone is watching to see the drama unfolding around Guangdong Governor Huang Huahua (黃華華). Huang's enormous power derives from Beijing because the establishment of the echelon succession system put in place mandatory retirement age limits for officials of every rank. As Guangdong is a large province, the possibility for officials there to be promoted into the ranks of the central government is relatively great, and in the wrangling between the central and local governments, few officials are willing to insist on local interests and give up the possibility of promotion.
Rare figures with the courage to resist, such as a former governor of the province, Ye Xuanping (
In 1768, an incident similar to the current epidemic took place in China. Rumors of sorcery in the form of "soulstealers" spread from southern China along the length of the Yangtze River and the Grand Canal. In approximately six months a national panic had arisen out of nothing and influenced the lives of 200 million people in 12 provinces. Only after the Qing court intervened to quell the rumors did they begin to die down.
In those days China had no Internet or text-messaging services. Information travelled far less easily than it does today. With great effort the rumors were suppressed by the court, only to emerge again on a smaller scale in 1810 and 1876.
Of course, SARS is real and "soulstealers" were only the stuff of hearsay. SARS is a product of modern China; "soulstealers" were more of a classical phenomenon. So the analogy is a bit of a stretch, but in terms of the government's ability to bring these situations under control, it is worth noting that a more powerful government machine is offset by the increased ease with which rumors are now transmitted.
Mathematically unmanageable China has once again encoun-tered the same problems that have plagued it for centuries. Its rulers want political stability, yet they can't come up with accurate statistical data. The structure of the official establishment does not permit open resistance to those at the highest levels or in the center. As a result, cover-ups are the only option.
In this way, many people's criticism of China for covering up the epidemic and putting people's lives at risk and claims that not making public the data on SARS is "not a matter of inability, but rather a matter of unwillingness" must be re-evaluated.
In fact, China's behavior is best summed up as precisely "a matter of inability," which is what Gao Qiang implied with his clever response.
Lee Tuo-tzu is a graduate student in the Graduate Institute of National Development at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Ethan Harkness
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS