Perpetrating stereotypes
In his article, David Momphard defined "the hidden minority," as those born in Taiwan, but raised in the US, or born in the US to Taiwanese parents ("The hidden identity," March 30, page 17). He continues by repeating a common misnomer by referring to them as "American-born Chinese," or ABCs.
I find it puzzling that these overseas Taiwanese are so often called ABCs. Shouldn't they more aptly be called American-born Taiwanese or ABTs? It is a simple label that clearly denotes one's country of origin.
Many Taiwanese or overseas Taiwanese still use the terms "Chinese" and "Taiwanese "interchangeably because of the confusion between national and ethnic identity. Or perhaps the lines have been blurred by mixed marriages.
As someone born in the US to Taiwanese parents, I proudly identify myself as a Taiwanese American, not a Chinese American. My parents were not raised in China, nor do they reside in China.
Momphard's depiction of "the hidden minority" in Taiwan proliferates the stereotypes of Taiwanese-born and raised overseas as spoiled, rich kids. It is unfair to categorize a group along narrow characteristics. There are many deeply personal reasons that ABTs have chosen to return to Taiwan -- which Momphard alludes to, but does not delve into.
Though Momphard didn't report on any major discrimination experienced by the hidden minority, there is discrimination, in subtle forms -- when one is chided for speaking Mandarin Chinese or Hokkien with a funny accent or constantly questioned as to why can't they speak Chinese as flawlessly as any native Taiwanese person. Discrimination occurs when members of the hidden minority, who are native English speakers in their own right, are paid less per hour for teaching English than other visually obvious foreigners.
Discrimination occurs when Taiwanese employers refuse to apply for work permits for the hidden minority; employers expect ABTs to have an ROC ID which entitles them to work in Taiwan, but other foreign-educated English speakers would most likely not meet such resistance from potential employers.
Certainly ABTs might be able to score the top jobs due to their foreign education and strong grasp of Chinese language skills, but their experiences are not without hidden discrimination.
Felicia Lin
Kaohsiung
Roy off-base about India
The opinion piece by Arundhati Roy is without any basis nor with any proof ("The resistable rise of Hindu fascism," April 8, page 9). India is a secular country and will remain so due to its culture of inheritance. Indian democracy is fair and vibrant. With advances in technology, the democracy in India is becoming fairer. How Roy concludes that democracy in India is unfair is beyond me.
Roy brings her communist ideology into her article, complaining about any form of institution that has power, as long as it is not communist.
Gautam Desai
Fremont, California
Arundhati Roy is well-known ideologue at the same time both sympathetic to terrorists and communists, and against Indian nationalists. Her opinion piece smacks of opinion, while presenting itself as fact.
Neither is India going towards fascism, nor do India's Hindu nationalists praise Adolph Hitler. Promotion of such fear serves to only further divisions within India, and give an improper picture to those looking at India from the outside.
India is a secular, democratic country where close to 1 billion people live in relative peace -- including over 800 million Hindus, 130 million Muslims, and tens of millions of Christians, Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists. Except for the state of Jammu and Kashmir, where Pakistan-supported Islamic terrorists have killed over 60,000 people, India remains mostly peaceful.
Today's so-called Hindu nationalists do seek to organize Hindus. There are several reasons for this: the Islamic attack against India is against India as a Hindu majority state, and the evangelical onslaught is to convert over 800 million Hindus to a fundamentalist school of Christianity. Also, Marxist ideologues like Roy draw fire from Hindus as they seek to claim that what is bad in India is because of India's 5,000 year-old traditions, called Hinduism, and what is good is that which does not come from Hinduism.
While there is great change occurring in India's social and political climate, India's commitment to pluralism, diversity, democracy and freedom still stands. India's so-called Hindu nationalist party, the BJP, elected a Muslim as president. The election commissioner is Christian. Supreme Court justices, chief ministers, governors and government secretaries continue to represent all religions.
The reality of India is quite different, and much more positive than Roy sees it.
Mihir Meghani
Fremont, California
Miles missed the boat
In his zeal to criticize presidential adviser Joseph Wu (
June Teufel Dreyer
Coral Gables, Florida
Perle piece a shame
It is a big disappointment and a shame that the Taipei Times makes itself the mouthpiece for a semi-fascist warmonger like Richard Perle ("Saddam's regime falls in Baghdad; UN falls in New York. Good!" April 14, page 9). How can the Taipei Times give a platform for the cynical and smug outpourings of such a figure of dubious intentions? To let him spit on the "bleating" UN bureaucrats, those very idiots that might actually care to "fight AIDs and malaria or protect children" -- very unlike Perle indeed. Why this hurrying obedience?
Torsten Nohl
Feng Yuan
Editor's note: If Richard Perle is a "semi-fascist warmonger," he is also one who wields huge influence in Washington. Surely readers should know what Perle thinks, even if only so they may more effectively oppose him.
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Prior to marrying a Taiwanese and moving to Taiwan, a Chinese woman, surnamed Zhang (張), used her elder sister’s identity to deceive Chinese officials and obtain a resident identity card in China. After marrying a Taiwanese, surnamed Chen (陳) and applying to move to Taiwan, Zhang continued to impersonate her sister to obtain a Republic of China ID card. She used the false identity in Taiwan for 18 years. However, a judge ruled that her case does not constitute forgery and acquitted her. Does this mean that — as long as a sibling agrees — people can impersonate others to alter, forge
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS