Many Taiwanese businesspeople in China have been affected by the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak. Some of them are even infected with the disease and are in critical condition. People can still avoid the contagion if they act cautiously. But the Chinese government is addicted to its bad habit of forging statistics and controlling the media to hide facts. This habit may cause greater damage to enterprises and investors in China than SARS does.
Statistics provided by China's central and local governments are often incorrect. For example, they usually overestimate production and underestimate taxes, making it very difficult for foreign enterprises to receive clear, dependable market information and economic indexes.
Influenced by such statistics and information, foreign enterprises are unable to make appropriate decisions and usually overestimate business opportunities. This eventually leads to the failure of their business operations.
Fake and boastful statistics can be seen everywhere and come as no surprise in today's China. Many US scholars repeatedly question China's economic growth rate, asking if it may be exaggerated. Misled by the highly overestimated growth rate, many foreign investors strive to invest in China, ultimately causing a deflation problem.
The Chinese government has long subsidized the money-losing state-run enterprises, causing a huge deficit. Since 1983, it has demanded that public banks loan to state-run enterprises to reduce this deficit. As a result, the bad loan ratios of the public banks are as high as 50 percent. They would have gone bankrupt long ago if this had happened in a democratic country. Bad loans at these banks represent an estimated US$500 billion, which accounts for 43 percent of China's GDP.
If we also take the losses in its social welfare and elderly subsidies into account, its internal and external debts are estimated to have exceeded its GDP.
Thanks to its people's relatively high savings ratio (over 40 percent) and the US$40 billion to US$50 billion in foreign capital that pours into its market every year, China enjoys sufficient flow of capital domestically, while the channels for investment are limited. The government has tightly controlled the media, so people are not aware of the real situation. They think that the government is capable of protecting their savings and continue to put their money into these banks.
Moreover, foreign exchange control is tight in an effort to reduce possible capital outflow. People have no choice but to hold yuan, since foreign currencies are not available. China has also strictly kept in check the local business operations of foreign banks in order to prohibit foreign investors' speculation in foreign exchange. All these factors and measures have kept the nation's financial market stable for the time being.
China is facing a potential financial crisis, which may be triggered at any time. The crisis may be ignited if people lose their confidence in the government when it becomes unable to hide the massive amount of bad loans and debts. It may also take place when the global economic downturn damages China's export or direct foreign investment figures. The significant impact of the 1997 Asian financial crisis is still fresh in our memory. If a financial crisis occurs in China, it will cause overall damage to the currency and stock markets. None of the Taiwanese businesspeople in China can escape from such a disaster.
In light of the SARS epidemic in China, are Taiwanese busi-nesspeople ready to reduce investments there in order to lower their risks?
Peter Lin is director of the Graduate Institute of Operation and Management at Kao Yuan Institute of Technology.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then