Many Taiwanese businesspeople in China have been affected by the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak. Some of them are even infected with the disease and are in critical condition. People can still avoid the contagion if they act cautiously. But the Chinese government is addicted to its bad habit of forging statistics and controlling the media to hide facts. This habit may cause greater damage to enterprises and investors in China than SARS does.
Statistics provided by China's central and local governments are often incorrect. For example, they usually overestimate production and underestimate taxes, making it very difficult for foreign enterprises to receive clear, dependable market information and economic indexes.
Influenced by such statistics and information, foreign enterprises are unable to make appropriate decisions and usually overestimate business opportunities. This eventually leads to the failure of their business operations.
Fake and boastful statistics can be seen everywhere and come as no surprise in today's China. Many US scholars repeatedly question China's economic growth rate, asking if it may be exaggerated. Misled by the highly overestimated growth rate, many foreign investors strive to invest in China, ultimately causing a deflation problem.
The Chinese government has long subsidized the money-losing state-run enterprises, causing a huge deficit. Since 1983, it has demanded that public banks loan to state-run enterprises to reduce this deficit. As a result, the bad loan ratios of the public banks are as high as 50 percent. They would have gone bankrupt long ago if this had happened in a democratic country. Bad loans at these banks represent an estimated US$500 billion, which accounts for 43 percent of China's GDP.
If we also take the losses in its social welfare and elderly subsidies into account, its internal and external debts are estimated to have exceeded its GDP.
Thanks to its people's relatively high savings ratio (over 40 percent) and the US$40 billion to US$50 billion in foreign capital that pours into its market every year, China enjoys sufficient flow of capital domestically, while the channels for investment are limited. The government has tightly controlled the media, so people are not aware of the real situation. They think that the government is capable of protecting their savings and continue to put their money into these banks.
Moreover, foreign exchange control is tight in an effort to reduce possible capital outflow. People have no choice but to hold yuan, since foreign currencies are not available. China has also strictly kept in check the local business operations of foreign banks in order to prohibit foreign investors' speculation in foreign exchange. All these factors and measures have kept the nation's financial market stable for the time being.
China is facing a potential financial crisis, which may be triggered at any time. The crisis may be ignited if people lose their confidence in the government when it becomes unable to hide the massive amount of bad loans and debts. It may also take place when the global economic downturn damages China's export or direct foreign investment figures. The significant impact of the 1997 Asian financial crisis is still fresh in our memory. If a financial crisis occurs in China, it will cause overall damage to the currency and stock markets. None of the Taiwanese businesspeople in China can escape from such a disaster.
In light of the SARS epidemic in China, are Taiwanese busi-nesspeople ready to reduce investments there in order to lower their risks?
Peter Lin is director of the Graduate Institute of Operation and Management at Kao Yuan Institute of Technology.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS