The Department of Health (DOH) recently ran a newspaper ad: "Both SARS and bandit spies come from China, but with everyone's hard work, the cases of SARS infection are less than the number of bandit spies [in Taiwan]." The ad was severely criticized for juxtaposing medical and health issues with the highly sensitive and political cross-strait relationship. It was also called an inappropriate political act. However, in light of the ongoing spy game between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, the ad vividly depicts the fact that there are no barriers that severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and "bandit spies" can't penetrate.
On Wednesday, the National Security Bureau and other law enforcement units cracked down on a group that specialized in brokering Chinese workers to work in this country while secretly smuggling in Chinese agents disguised as average workers. Government statistics indicate that this network probably brought in more than 500 Chinese. Only a further investigation will make clear how many of them were spies. For the moment, we appear to have backslid to the days when our entire country joined in the campaign to hunt down "bandit spies."
With the spread of the SARS epidemic, it seems reasonable to associate China with the illness, which appears to have originated in Guangdong Province. The National Police Administration and the Council for Labor Affairs took turns in tightening the control and management of brides, workers, stowaways and other people from China. As the Temporary Provisions Effective During the Period of Communist Rebellion were abolished in 1987, the government no longer considers the two sides of the Strait to be in a state of war. However, China has adamantly refused to denounce the use of force against Taiwan and has also refused signing any treaty officially ending the war. Therefore, Taiwan has never really progressed beyond the stage of cross-strait hostility.
When the Temporary Provisions Effective During the Period of Communist Rebellion were in force, there was a very clear awareness of enemy hostility, which made it easy to prevent enemy infiltration. With increased cross-strait interaction and flourishing economic and personal exchanges between the two sides, not to mention the abundant politicians who toddy to China, people have begun to lose their sense of alertness. Evidently, Taiwan has gotten used to comfortable living, completely forgetting about the existence of its enemies and the lurking of impending crises.
In terms of national security, the SARS outbreak may herald a positive new beginning. As a result of the epidemic and the successful unearthing of the spy network, the government has a chance to re-establish an awareness of national security issues in the mind of the public, reminding people that China is a hostile enemy. Even as the SARS virus does its damage internally, Chinese spies are here to topple the country from within.
Moreover, the government also needs to perform enhanced security checks on the Chinese entering Taiwan. Besides inspecting documents and paperwork, DNA checks of incoming Chinese dependents must be conducted to ascertain the existence of the required blood relationship. As for Chinese brides, they should also be followed and monitored. We must strengthen the management of Chinese workers nationwide. Perhaps the comparison between the SARS epidemic and "bandit spies" is questionable. But from the standpoint of national security, recent experience offers new revelations about the threat of Chinese spies.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
A report by the US-based Jamestown Foundation on Tuesday last week warned that China is operating illegal oil drilling inside Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the Taiwan-controlled Pratas Island (Dongsha, 東沙群島), marking a sharp escalation in Beijing’s “gray zone” tactics. The report said that, starting in July, state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp installed 12 permanent or semi-permanent oil rig structures and dozens of associated ships deep inside Taiwan’s EEZ about 48km from the restricted waters of Pratas Island in the northeast of the South China Sea, islands that are home to a Taiwanese garrison. The rigs not only typify
RSS