The Kaohsiung City Council opened its new session on Tuesday, with its speaker and vice speaker still in police custody on vote-buying charges. The TSU's legislative caucus and more than a dozen non-governmental organizations (NGOs) from Kaohsiung staged a protest, demanding that all the councilors implicated in the vote-buying scandal step down voluntarily so that by-elections can be held. A clash between demonstrators and police resulted in injuries to some TSU legislators and reporters.
The city council immediately issued a statement condemning the violence and calling on "people not to trample on democracy in the name of democracy or shame Kaohsiung City."
The statement leaves one wondering whether to laugh or cry. Apparently it was a case of the thief crying "Thief!" A city council that shames the entire country is now accusing the protesters of shaming the city.
We are absolutely against violence, but people who criticize Tuesday's clash are missing the point. They are deliberately trying to divert attention from the facts and sideline the demands of the protesters.
What's even more unfortunate was that only TSU legislators attended the protest, while the DPP voiced support from Taipei. KMT and PFP lawmakers were perhaps too busy scheming for next year's presidential election, or perhaps their two chairmen, Lien Chan (連戰) and James Soong (宋楚瑜), were still basking in the euphoria of their nominations to run for the presidency by their respective parties on Sunday. They may have forgotten that when the vote-buying scandal broke the parties scrambled to expel their bribe-taking councilors and vowed to push for the recall of the speaker and vice speaker. Now the two parties seem to be interested only in grabbing power next year. For them, Kaohsiung's vote-buying scandal has long ago blown away with the wind.
They are wrong. The people's anger is not gone yet. The KMT-PFP reticence on the matter only reflects their political miscalculation. Having talked so much about eradicating "black gold" corruption, the two parties have once again proved how hypocritical they are.
The DPP also expressed indignation about the matter on Tuesday. After a meeting of the party's Central Standing Committee, committee member Kao Jyh-peng (高志鵬), speaking on the party's behalf, immediately called on Kaohsiung's residents and NGOs to push for the recall of the council's speaker and vice speaker. Kao also criticized the KMT and the PFP for blocking the DPP's proposals for reforming the city council.
To resolve the legal and political problems posed by the vote-buying scandal, the DPP has already proposed amendments to the Law on Local Government Systems (地方制度法) and the Election and Recall Law (選舉罷免法). Under the new amendments, council speakers and vice speakers could be suspended from their posts once they are found guilty in court. They could also be recalled in the first year of their term, as opposed to having to wait until the second year, as is the case now. The proposal has been sent to the Legislative Yuan for review.
Kao angrily slammed the opposition camp on Tuesday for blocking the proposed amendments. He also called on them to quickly negotiate and pass the bills so as to resolve the problems facing the Kaohsiung City Council and to prevent similar scandals in the future.
Old habits don't die easily, however. The KMT is a party with "black gold" roots while the PFP is one of the KMT's splinter parties. They have vowed time and again to eradicate the cancer of "black gold," but their vows have turned out to be all bark, no bite.
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of