Folks in the opposition parties and pro-China media have been going all out to attack the Chen Shui-bian (
But their opposition to war is very questionable. Remember, they have frequently served as Beijing's mouthpieces and have never missed a chance to use China's military threats to intimidate pro-independence forces. Every time former president Lee Teng-hui (
Deep down, they are supporters of Chinese military power because they can use the threat of it to ensure their political influence. They habitually use Beijing's military threat to intimidate their political opponents.
Why did they become ardent anti-war advocates? It certainly was not out of any deep-seated belief in pacifism. The reason is very simple. They oppose Chen and therefore they oppose his policies. They oppose him because they suspect Chen is not loyal to China, because they view him as an advocate of independence and therefore an enemy of China.
Following the rise of Chinese nationalism across the Strait and the transition of political power in Taiwan, their feelings toward the US have become increasingly complex. In the days of KMT rule, former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (
However, with the rise of native Taiwanese awareness and following the KMT's loss of power, the pro-unification folks have fallen into despair. Their feelings toward Taiwan and its people have also become increasingly complex. On top of this come the economic incentives from China and the calls of Chinese nationalism. All these have changed the pro-unification people's feelings toward the US and Taiwan.
The US no longer appears to be Taiwan's protector against a possible Chinese invasion. On the contrary, it has become a new hegemony aiding pro-independence forces, attempting to stop the unification of China and preventing China from becoming stronger. For them, China is no longer a threat. It is their motherland.
For this reason, the pro-unification media and scholars in recent years have always subscribed to anti-US opinions around the world. By disseminating fears about a unipolar world, they have tried to vilify the US and its role as a global policeman. Meanwhile, they have tried to paint China as the world's future superpower.
At every key moment in Taiwan's domestic politics or the international situation, the pan-blue camp has echoed the Chinese nationalists across the Strait. All these have been occasioned by Chen and the US. In their eyes, Chen is an obstacle to China's unification, the US an obstacle to China becoming strong.
Since coming to power the DPP has copied the KMT's foreign policy verbatim -- pro-US, pro-West and providing more aid to diplomatic allies. That's because Taiwan has no other choice. Taiwan of course would like to be pro-China, pro-Russia or pro-the entire world, but none of these countries support this country in the least bit. Now the opposition is criticizing the DPP for adopting the very same policies of the former administration. Supporting the US is now called kissing America's backside. Providing aid to allies is now called "sugar daddy diplomacy."
As they accuse Lee and Chen of attempt to split China, what a shame that the opposition folks don't realize they are attempting to split Taiwan.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS