On March 15, former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) formally proposed recognition of Taiwanese nationhood at a meeting of the World Federation of Taiwanese Associations (世界台灣人大會). He also laid down the main guidelines for a new Constitution establishing the nation Taiwan.
Constitutional reform is the kind of healthy thinking the people of any sovereign and independent state should entertain, but it was criticized by PFP Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜). He believes it would anger "Communist China" (中共), and that most nations "would not accept Taiwan independence." Such statements once again throw Soong's and Lien Chan's (連戰) slogan "the Republic of China is a sovereign and independent state" into a state of extreme political confusion.
Taiwan is deceiving the world by using the name Republic of China. The world is abundantly clear on the fact that Taiwan is the factual entity and that the Republic of China is a political corpse expelled from the international community. Taiwan still clings to this false status, living out a life in degradation. Soong's logic is the laughing stock of today's society and its only market is the unificationist camp.
To put down the Taiwanese people's hope of independence and sovereignty, Soong even suggested that other nations would not accept Taiwan independence. We want to ask Soong if China, a constant threat to Taiwan, would ask the US, Japan or Europe for permission to invade Taiwan. But when Taiwan wants to build a peaceful, democratic and free country called Taiwan, he wants to ask whether other nations agree. What kind of logic is that? It's ridiculous.
POLITICAL RESPONSIBILITY
The people of Taiwan should ask Soong, who talks loudly of his love for Taiwan, whether he accepts that Taiwan is a sovereign and independent state. We should ask him to be unambiguously clear.
Someone intending to run for president should possess political intelligence and a sense of mission, and call for the people to protect their own nation. Soong, however, scorns the moral courage and political responsibility such a political leader should possess and threatens the people of Taiwan with the enemy. If we really needed such politicians, wouldn't it be faster simply to surrender?
When faced with invasion and an anti-humanitarian dictatorship, a self-respecting people should stand up and protect itself. If the leaders of Vietnam constantly had told their people not to anger China, would it still exist?
Soong's threats about what will happen if we anger China are only meant to consolidate the political thinking and interests of his China-friendly political clique. He doesn't consider the fate and future of the people of Taiwan, and is exchanging the lives of the whole people for his own personal interests.
The KMT has lived through 50 years of colonialist thinking of a united greater China. This is still poisoning the spirit of the Taiwanese people, and many Taiwanese must have been seriously affected by this China poison to be taken in by Soong's and Lien's coarse political lies.
Protecting Taiwan and not angering China are mutually exclusive concepts. Someone who wants to protect Taiwan without angering China only pretends to love Taiwan and does not intend to protect it. How come the Taiwanese people still haven't seen through this kind of politician?
Tzeng Kuei-hai is chairman of the Southern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS