Now that the war in Iraq has officially begun, many important and urgent tasks await the government. Fortunately, despite a "much-ado-about-nothing" panic about terrorist suspects from Pakistan, the government's response to the war has so far been decent.
Since Taiwan plays no real part in the war, the biggest tasks at hand for the government are to calm public anxiety, maintain social order and see to it that there are no shortages of materials essential to people's daily lives. In addition, it must get ready for participation in the post-relief work in Iraq.
In this regard, Premier Yu Shyi-kun's briefings to the public and to the Legislative Yuan about the government's response have been both timely and effective. In those briefings, Yu reassured the public that it need not worry about an oil shortage as there are enough reserves to meet the domestic demand for up to 115 days.
But shortages are not the only worry. Before the war began, many had expressed concerns about the possibility of China seizing the opportunity to make hostile moves toward Taiwan. To those people, Yu said that there has been, so far, no change in the cross-strait situation. In fact, in an effort to calm fears, both Yu and Minister of National Defense Tang Yau-ming (
These gestures by Yu have been reciprocated with support from the Legislative Yuan. After Yu's briefing yesterday, Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
It is very important for the Legislative Yuan and Executive Yuan -- and in fact all branches of government -- to show such unity at a time like this. Anything less would create deep skepticism about the government's ability to deal with potential crises and make the public vulnerable to fear-mongering and panic.
Still, it is hard to say whether this truce and appearance of cohesion will be ruined by the verbal fire of loose-cannon lawmakers seeking to scupper the ship of state and make a name for themselves. It is hoped that Yu's attempts to reach out to all the political parties can win him some goodwill from the opposition.
The political parties may get some inspiration from their American counterparts and do the right thing for a change. On Thursday, the US Senate united behind President George W. Bush and voted 99-0 in support of the deployment of troops in Iraq.
In reality, this can be intepreted not so much as unanimous support for the war but as a desire to show American unity in time of need.
Before the war was launched, whether it was right or wrong to do so was -- in accordance with democratic traditions -- an issue open to debate. Last fall, a substantial number of US Congress members voted against giving formal congressional approval to military action against Iraq. In addition, the Democratic opposition leader Tom Daschle openly criticized Bush's handling of the Iraqi question.
But now that the battle has begun, the arguments are moot. Such differences are put aside and even Daschle has voiced his support for Bush. This is because everyone knows that the country needs their cooperation to see things through.
We can only hope that the same kind of unity can be seen in Taiwan.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS