The latest statistics indicate that the number of Taiwanese businessmen serving time in Chinese prisons has reached more than 900. In the Pearl River Delta region alone, there are several hundred Taiwanese businessmen doing jail time.
Among them, many were found to have been guilty of illegal smuggling and others of falsifying export reports. Many of the businessmen thought it was OK because their conduct was not illegal in Taiwan or at least ran no risk of a prison term here. Those with such ignorance of Chinese laws are often the ones learning some really harsh lessons.
In many instances, those who crossed the Taiwan Strait, hot with "China fever" were conned or swindled. Many people with assets and wealth were deceived by the myth of China and took their money there. In the end, they often came back after having sustained devastating losses.
But those who managed to return should still by considered lucky. There are those who fared worse -- not only have they lost their fortunes, but now they've lost their freedom. Worse yet, some Taiwanese businessmen take all their money to China, leaving behind debts which must be born by their countrymen.
In the above-described scenarios, the relevant parties of course do not want to make a fuss because they want to save face. The pro-unification media and pro-China groups, who are pre-occupied with praising and kissing up to the communist state, won't bother to mention these things.
One cannot help but wonder what was on the mind of those who pressured the government to open up investments in China when they saw how some businessmen were already suffering from devastating losses.
Do those who had fantasies about China -- and who complained loudly about token incentives -- have any regrets when they lose their fortunes in China?
The Taiwanese must become alert about opening up investments in China before it is too late to do anything about it. The business losses or the prison sentences of individual Taiwanese businessmen are their own problems. However, if both the ruling and opposition camps support "active opening up" of investments in China, at stake is much more than any responsibility that any individual can bear. Rather, it is something that will impact everyone here in Taiwan. If people in Taiwan do not see things from a long-term perspective, it is only a matter of time before the country is sucked dry by these pipe dreams.
In recent years, the domestic economy has been on a rapid decline as a result of technological and capital flow to China. The number of unemployed people and those who face immediate unemployment is increasing by the day.
This is a change that is easily sensed by everyone. Yet it is only the tip of the iceberg in terms of the side effects of opening up investments across the Strait. Less likely to be sensed are the impacts on government finances, financial order, national defense, social welfare, foreign affairs and the wealth of individual citizens.
If the nation's two major political camps continue to loosen China-investment regulations, can the people of Taiwan maintain their life of affluence here? Will Taiwan's economic performance continue to be the subject of praise and envy?
Not only do deluded industries and capitalists blindly head across the Strait but some people also gradually lose confidence in the direction of this country.
The economic growth of China over the past decade is commonplace in developing countries. In the past, the four "dragons" of Asia -- Taiwan, South Korea, Hong Kong and Singapore -- experienced the same kind of growth.
Yet, it is ironic to see those who used to oppose communism and support retaking the "Chinese mainland" now glorifying China through market theory, opportunity theory and so on. Some people who were in the past deceived by the myth about retaking the "motherland" and fighting communists are now again being deceived by all the new propaganda about China.
These people are truly beyond redemption. Since these people claim that China is no longer a communist country but a new economic superpower where endless opportunities lie, why don't they just go there now?
A lot of Taiwanese businessmen imprisoned in China do not know what they have done wrong. This proves that in China the rule of law is absent -- both in politics and economics -- which is in stark contrast with to the protection of human rights in Taiwan: Those who venture to China do so at their own risk.
During the meeting of the National People's Congress in China recently, the spokesperson openly conceded that one of the most serious problems of China right now is corruption by government officials at all levels.
In the past decade or so, as the Chinese economy has thrived, the problem of official corruption has become worse. It has reached the point where virtually no official is exempt and no amount of government threats or crackdowns can improve things.
The problem does not rest with individuals. Rather, it is the product of an inadequate system. So long as China does not run according to the rule of law, the problem of corruption will persist.
And so long as corruption persists, the investments of Taiwanese businessmen in China will continue to suffer huge risks or even be sacrificed in China's "anti-corruption" melodrama. It is likely that a lot of Taiwanese businessmen serving time in China are victims of these stage shows.
In both the ruling and opposition camps, there are people who tirelessly exalt political unification and economic integration. If these are things worth pursuing, then they must necessarily bring enormous benefits to the people of Taiwan.
Taiwan's GNP is about US$13,000 per capita, while the GNP of urban China only about US$935 per capita. The figure for rural China is only US$300 per capita.
Can the people of Taiwan have higher earnings after unification or integration? The average monthly wage in Taiwan is about NT$40,000, the wage in urban China is only about 700 yuan to 1,000 yuan, which comes to, at most, NT$4,000.
If the two sides of the Strait become unified, the average wage in Taiwan will necessarily become equalized with that of China. Is this what the people of Taiwan want for themselves?
Politicians can be shortsighted and disregard the consequences of their actions. But the people of Taiwan must refrain from dancing to their tune and tell the politicians not to be overwhelmed by China fever.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS