Ever since we entered the 21st century, the opinions of academics and businesspeople regarding the future of the Chinese economy have been diametrically opposed. Why do they hold such diverse opinions?
One faction led by Gordon Chang (
Overall, the Chinese economic situation is one of outward strength and domestic weakness. Its strength derives mainly from foreign capital and the increase in exports it creates. Currently, both the foreign investment and the export situation are looking quite good, seeing 23 and 19 percent growth, respectively, during the first three quarters of last year.
Domestic problems basically stem from issues created by state-owned enterprises, the financial system and agricultural reform. These include problems in national finances, social security, unemployment, deflation, income distribution and imbalances in regional development. These problems are worsening continuously.
There is thus a strong contrast between the performance of the external and domestic economies, making a correct assessment of the future of the economy next to impossible.
Let's take look at the sources of China's economic growth -- active financial policies and the contributions by foreign capital and exports. Financial policies and foreign capital (including exports by foreign-owned businesses) each contributed about 30 percent of economic growth in the late 1990s. It will probably be impossible to maintain this situation in future.
China's budget deficits have in recent years risen to the level where warning bells go off internationally -- 3 percent. Add to this other explicit and hidden debts. Chinese officials and academics are all of the opinion that these policies cannot be perpetuated.
During the 1990s, Chinese exports grew at an average annual rate of 16 percent. International markets will probably not be able to support such growth ad infinitum. Further, many foreign investors are still losing money. Inability to turn these losses into profits in future will probably affect the willingness of foreign businesses to invest.
The above assessment seems to be slightly pessimistic, but not to the point where it sees the Chinese economy collapsing. Quantitative research by many different economic models by Chinese officialdom, the World Bank, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the Asian Development Bank, Chinese academics and US investment consultancies shows that the rate of economic growth will remain between 3 percent and 8 percent between 2000 and 2020.
The main factor affecting the speed of economic growth will be whether economic reform and transformation will be successful, leading to more efficient use of economic resources and increased productivity.
This forecast, however, is purely based on economic premises and it only considers the supply side, ignoring the demand side, social stability or political variables.
The main question about economic development is not one of speed or the difference between 3 percent or 8 percent, but rather one of the difference between success or failure, prosperity or collapse.
Unless China can keep up effective economic growth of about 8 percent, it will be unable to handle the challenges posed by economic reform and transformation. This may create social and political turmoil, a withdrawal of foreign capital and a serious financial crisis, and lead to a steep decline in the Chinese economy. This would create a serious vicious circle possibly leading to an economic, social and political collapse.
The question, thus, is not whether the economy can continue to grow, but whether it can grow quickly.
This is also why academics and businessmen can hold such diverging opinions -- one faction takes a more comprehensive approach, the other only a fundamental economic approach.
This assessment is corroborated by Chinese leaders. Premier Zhu Rongji (
Chinese officialdom estimate that aggressive financial policies added about 2 percent to GDP growth between 1998 and 2001. That a difference of 2 percent is enough to cause an economic entity enjoying an 8 percent economic growth rate to collapse shows that China's problems can only be solved through rapid growth. Other-wise the economy might collapse.
Tung Chen-yuan is an assistant research fellow in the Institute of International Relations at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry gives it a strategic advantage, but that advantage would be threatened as the US seeks to end Taiwan’s monopoly in the industry and as China grows more assertive, analysts said at a security dialogue last week. While the semiconductor industry is Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” its dominance has been seen by some in the US as “a monopoly,” South Korea’s Sungkyunkwan University academic Kwon Seok-joon said at an event held by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In addition, Taiwan lacks sufficient energy sources and is vulnerable to natural disasters and geopolitical threats from China, he said.
After reading the article by Hideki Nagayama [English version on same page] published in the Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) on Wednesday, I decided to write this article in hopes of ever so slightly easing my depression. In August, I visited the National Museum of Ethnology in Osaka, Japan, to attend a seminar. While there, I had the chance to look at the museum’s collections. I felt extreme annoyance at seeing that the museum had classified Taiwanese indigenous peoples as part of China’s ethnic minorities. I kept thinking about how I could make this known, but after returning
What value does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hold in Taiwan? One might say that it is to defend — or at the very least, maintain — truly “blue” qualities. To be truly “blue” — without impurities, rejecting any “red” influence — is to uphold the ideology consistent with that on which the Republic of China (ROC) was established. The KMT would likely not object to this notion. However, if the current generation of KMT political elites do not understand what it means to be “blue” — or even light blue — their knowledge and bravery are far too lacking
Taipei’s population is estimated to drop below 2.5 million by the end of this month — the only city among the nation’s six special municipalities that has more people moving out than moving in this year. A city that is classified as a special municipality can have three deputy mayors if it has a population of more than 2.5 million people, Article 55 of the Local Government Act (地方制度法) states. To counter the capital’s shrinking population, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) held a cross-departmental population policy committee meeting on Wednesday last week to discuss possible solutions. According to Taipei City Government data, Taipei’s