This international conference on security is of great significance. The ongoing war on terrorism in the Middle East, the escalating nuclear crisis in North Korea and the series of terrorist attacks in Southeast Asia all pose grave threats to our security. However, in the long term, as reported in the US Department of Defense report on China's military power, an even more serious challenge is China's rapid military build-up in the absence of any actual or perceived military threat against it. Most conspicuous is China's deployment of short-range and long-range missiles, which not only intimidate neighboring countries but also signify China's imminent threat. We are deeply troubled by China's strategic aims. Moreover, China is an undemocratic regime that has been brutal toward its people and hegemonic toward its neighbors, thus causing fear and insecurity in the peoples and societies of the Asia-Pacific region.
In addition to traditional notions on military security, many scholars and experts are beginning to discuss new concepts such as economic security and human security. We are aware of worsening problems including environmental pollution, natural disasters, government corruption, AIDS, maritime security and transnational crime. In seeking a solution, we realize that only through regional cooperation among nations can these threats to human security be controlled.
I think the convening of this inter-parliamentary conference in Taiwan is especially valuable. While both Northeast Asia and Southeast Asia have multilateral regional mechanisms for security dialogue, the Taiwan Strait remains the only region without any such security arrangement. The ASEAN Regional Forum could have played an important role in the Strait, but it deliberately excluded Taiwan from participating. I presume that the participants of this security conference can sense that Taiwan is making great efforts to repel its constant military threat.
In order to address the challenges to Asia-Pacific regional security, we must reconfirm that Asia-Pacific nations share common fundamental values. I personally believe that democracy is the chief fundamental value that we all share. Democracy embodies the highest respect for human life, property and human rights. Thus, democratic nations would not threaten or attack other countries. The validity of "democracy and peace" has both theoretical foundation and substantive proof.
Since its peaceful transfer of power in 2000, Taiwan has become a truly democratic country. We are more than happy to share with other Asia-Pacific nations our many experiences with democratization so that together we may construct a regional security network. Taiwan must help more people and more countries enjoy the fruits of democracy, including the people of China. To fulfill this goal, Asia-Pacific nations must concur that Taiwan is a vibrant democracy and will not revert to authoritarianism at any cost. The purpose of Taiwan's close cooperation with other nations on security issues is to ensure that Taiwan's hard-won democracy is not sabotaged. Taiwan's democracy proves that the universal values of democracy and human rights are compatible with Chinese culture. Like a lighthouse beacon, Taiwan's democracy emboldens all hearts desirous of democracy in the Asia-Pacific.
In my New Year's address, I mentioned that since the Sept. 11 events, Taiwan as a responsible member of the international community has proactively participated in anti-terrorist activities and humanitarian aid efforts. However, I must remind the international community that only democracy, not anti-terrorism campaigns, can cure the root of the problem. Additionally, I hereby announce that the "Taiwan Democracy Foundation" will be officially established in June of this year. Through this foundation, we will cooperate with our allies and international friends to realize the goal of global democratization.
I believe that all participants at this Asia-Pacific security conference will contribute to valuable discussions on security issues. Moreover, I believe that participants will turn words into action by taking conference conclusions home to formulate legislation and conceive a framework for regional peace and security.
Lastly, I wish you all a successful conference. I hope that our international guests will have time to explore this beautiful island, witness Taiwan's democracy and freedoms, and share with the Taiwanese people their joy and pride in our progress and development.
President Chen Shui-bian delivered this speech at the opening of the International Inter-Parliamentary Conference on Asian Pacific Security on Jan. 17.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS