EFL study tips
I write to respond to the comments of Chang Yen-chung on the teaching of English in your country, ("Letters," Jan. 15, page 8).
The first thing you must do is define why you are learning English. By this I mean; be clear as to whether you are going to learn English, or any other foreign language, to converse with foreigners, to write English translations of Chinese books or other material, to move to another country where English is the language of use, and so on.
This may sound simplistic but it is very important because these different goals require very different levels of understanding. The students themselves can do a great deal to help themselves in this matter. They can, for example, buy English newspapers such as the Taipei Times and learn to read them. Also, the Internet can be of enormous benefit here because of its ability to give you access to any country's press and literature. Students can also seek out places where English is spoken regularly and learn from the people they meet. Another possibility is for students to seek English-speaking pen-pals with whom to exchange letters or e-mail.
Most important of all, any English program must teach the student how to think in English. If you cannot think in English you will never be able to learn to speak or write effectively in English. No one, regardless of his or her skill at memorization, can hold more than one language at a time in his or her mind. As a personal example of this, I live in Canada and own several power tools which are made in Taiwan. The machines are very well made and work perfectly. But the operators manuals can be very difficult to understand because they were translated into English by people who were still thinking in Chinese. Other examples can be found on a Web site called, www.engrish.com. These examples may seem amusing to us Westerners, but I don't think they are amusing to the people who wrote them.
I agree completely with Chang Yen-chung's idea that English immersion is one of the best ways to learn. If a student is placed in an environment in which English is the only language that is spoken or written, he or she is forced to learn it. This can be difficult to do in reality though. Exchange programs with English-only schools are one possibility, although I don't know how practicable that is in Taiwan. Advanced students might consider an exchange program with a school in the US or Canada, although again I do not know how practical this is.
Lastly, any person hired to teach English in your country should have at least a basic understanding of your culture and history and speak a little Chinese. This will add enormously to his or her credibility with the students. My nephew is teaching English in South Korea and is taking a sabbatical to attend a Korean university to study the Korean language and culture. He thinks it will help him a great deal to relate to his students in the future.
Earl Goudie
British Columbia,Canada
Two sides to IPR issues
Your editorial "Taiwan: keep walking with IPR" is simplistic (Jan. 16, page 8).
The recently settled Californian class action against Microsoft has shown that consumers may be overcharged when buying from monopolies. IPR creates a monopoly. So governments need to back up the privilege of intellectual property rights with laws that ensure consumers are not overcharged.
People have no respect for thieves; but when consumers see that they are being overcharged, who are the thieves?
Rick Jelliffe
Sydney, Australia
North Korean movie reviews
I didn't see the new Bond movie Die Another Day, but now that I have read the review from the North Korean SCPRF press office, I'm glad I didn't. The SCPRF is the Secretariat of the Committee for the Peaceful Reunification of the Fatherland. But I suppose everybody already knows that. Who doesn't read the SCPRF movie reviews in the DPRK press these days?
The SCPRF thought the Bond movie wasn't too good except for its special effects. In fact it was mostly nothing but a "dirty and cursed burlesque" and a "premeditated act of mocking."
The villain in the movie does not represent the true face of North Korea. That the movie came from the American motion picture industry only proves one thing: the US is "the headquarters that spreads abnormality, degeneration, violence and fin de siecle, corrupt, sex culture."
Eric Mader-Lin
Taipei
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS