EFL study tips
I write to respond to the comments of Chang Yen-chung on the teaching of English in your country, ("Letters," Jan. 15, page 8).
The first thing you must do is define why you are learning English. By this I mean; be clear as to whether you are going to learn English, or any other foreign language, to converse with foreigners, to write English translations of Chinese books or other material, to move to another country where English is the language of use, and so on.
This may sound simplistic but it is very important because these different goals require very different levels of understanding. The students themselves can do a great deal to help themselves in this matter. They can, for example, buy English newspapers such as the Taipei Times and learn to read them. Also, the Internet can be of enormous benefit here because of its ability to give you access to any country's press and literature. Students can also seek out places where English is spoken regularly and learn from the people they meet. Another possibility is for students to seek English-speaking pen-pals with whom to exchange letters or e-mail.
Most important of all, any English program must teach the student how to think in English. If you cannot think in English you will never be able to learn to speak or write effectively in English. No one, regardless of his or her skill at memorization, can hold more than one language at a time in his or her mind. As a personal example of this, I live in Canada and own several power tools which are made in Taiwan. The machines are very well made and work perfectly. But the operators manuals can be very difficult to understand because they were translated into English by people who were still thinking in Chinese. Other examples can be found on a Web site called, www.engrish.com. These examples may seem amusing to us Westerners, but I don't think they are amusing to the people who wrote them.
I agree completely with Chang Yen-chung's idea that English immersion is one of the best ways to learn. If a student is placed in an environment in which English is the only language that is spoken or written, he or she is forced to learn it. This can be difficult to do in reality though. Exchange programs with English-only schools are one possibility, although I don't know how practicable that is in Taiwan. Advanced students might consider an exchange program with a school in the US or Canada, although again I do not know how practical this is.
Lastly, any person hired to teach English in your country should have at least a basic understanding of your culture and history and speak a little Chinese. This will add enormously to his or her credibility with the students. My nephew is teaching English in South Korea and is taking a sabbatical to attend a Korean university to study the Korean language and culture. He thinks it will help him a great deal to relate to his students in the future.
Earl Goudie
British Columbia,Canada
Two sides to IPR issues
Your editorial "Taiwan: keep walking with IPR" is simplistic (Jan. 16, page 8).
The recently settled Californian class action against Microsoft has shown that consumers may be overcharged when buying from monopolies. IPR creates a monopoly. So governments need to back up the privilege of intellectual property rights with laws that ensure consumers are not overcharged.
People have no respect for thieves; but when consumers see that they are being overcharged, who are the thieves?
Rick Jelliffe
Sydney, Australia
North Korean movie reviews
I didn't see the new Bond movie Die Another Day, but now that I have read the review from the North Korean SCPRF press office, I'm glad I didn't. The SCPRF is the Secretariat of the Committee for the Peaceful Reunification of the Fatherland. But I suppose everybody already knows that. Who doesn't read the SCPRF movie reviews in the DPRK press these days?
The SCPRF thought the Bond movie wasn't too good except for its special effects. In fact it was mostly nothing but a "dirty and cursed burlesque" and a "premeditated act of mocking."
The villain in the movie does not represent the true face of North Korea. That the movie came from the American motion picture industry only proves one thing: the US is "the headquarters that spreads abnormality, degeneration, violence and fin de siecle, corrupt, sex culture."
Eric Mader-Lin
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS