English teaching woes
The Taipei Times points out that the problems of English language teaching in Taiwan have to do with methodology and suggests that foreign teachers might be helpful to "train local teachers" and "compile teaching materials" ("A lot to learn about teaching English," Jan. 7, page 8).
I am very familiar with Taiwanese scholarship in foreign language teaching. I have attended the last two meetings of the English Teachers' Association of Taiwan and have read the proceedings of all meetings held since 1993. There is just as much expertise in language teaching in Taiwan as there is anywhere in the world. There is no need to bring in foreigners, often from monolingual countries that do not support bilingualism, with little knowledge of the local situation. I agree with the Taipei Times that methodology can be improved, but I suggest that the Ministry of Education first take advantage of its own experts.
Stephen Krashen
University of Southern California, CA
Your editorial made several excellent points concerning English-language education in Taiwan ("A lot to learn about teaching English," Jan. 7, page 8). You placed the blame, for example, squarely on the teaching methods and the emphasis on memorization. You also made a good suggestion as to how to use foreign teachers to train our local teachers. I would like to add a few cents of my own.
Firstly, the memorization problem is driven by our archaic notions about learning, which have been carried over from the old test-centered mandarin examination system. It really can't be effectively applied to evaluate language skills and functional competency.
Secondly, teaching methods are also driven by testing requirements, which are by and large a static approach to language acquisition.
Thirdly, we really need to change this teaching approach from static to dynamic. By dynamic, I mean that we need to learn to use the language instead of studying it solely to pass tests.
To be able to use the language we need to learn to speak the language first. From my own teaching experience, I disagree with your view that English-language acquisition can't be achieved through English without the aid of explanations in another language. As a matter of fact, we all learned our mother tongue through our mother tongue. It is the method that counts. (Using real objects in live situations initially will resolve the problem of guesswork, as you contended.)
Yes, if our teaching methods and preoccupation with testing remain unchanged, what would be the point of hiring foreign teachers at a high salary? It might be a waste of time and would deplete our national treasury which is not so full at this point in time.
Chang Yen-chung
Taoyuan, Taoyuan County
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS