With a view to improving English proficiency in coordination with the Executive Yuan's "Challenge 2008" plan, the Ministry of Education has decided to spend NT$1.3 billion hiring foreign English teachers to teach at state-run elementary and high schools and to help train local teachers. The plan will begin this summer. The target will be to recruit 1,000 foreign English teachers per year at salaries ranging from NT$60,000 to NT$90,000. This is a major change. Foreign teachers naturally have a better command of English, but that does not necessarily mean the teaching results would be better.
In the same vain, Taiwan used to be known for high TOEFL scores, but high TOEFL scores do not necessarily represent high proficiency in English. After TOEFL changed its test format to include essay writing, the test scores of Taiwanese students are now ranked 14th in Asia, better only than Japan. Such results naturally worry a government eager to internationalize. Now English courses have been moved ahead to begin from elementary school instead of junior high. But the problems in Taiwan's English education lie not with how early it begins, but with the syllabus, teaching methods and learning environment. English education in Taiwan places too much emphasis on memorization. Consequently, the learning results are poor.
Hiring foreign teachers at high salaries can only resolve part of the problem. The good points of foreign teachers are: they know the correct pronunciation; their teaching methods are lively; they can link the lessons to daily life; they can help students get over the apprehension of speaking to a foreigner. The drawbacks: foreign teachers have difficulty communicating in Chinese; they cannot explain lessons in ways that are easily understandable, leading to a great deal of guesswork for students. All in all, hiring foreign teachers is very costly and the quality of the teachers can be very uneven. At the kindergarten and advanced levels, they have much to offer that local teachers cannot. However, at mid levels, there are both advantages and disadvantages to hiring local or foreign teachers.
Hiring foreign English teachers would not be a problem if the government were financially healthy. But everyone knows that the government is in a budget predicament. A foreign teacher costs twice as much as a local teacher. Besides, hiring foreign teachers at high salaries will not only have a crowding-out effect on local English teachers, but will also seriously affect job opportunities for other foreigners in Taiwan. Last year, the Executive Yuan considered making English the country's second official language and trained more than 3,000 English teachers. Many of those teachers are still jobless, and yet the education ministry is trumpeting its plan to hire foreign teachers, thereby seriously affecting the local training programs.
This newspaper recognizes the contribution of foreign teachers to English education, but the ministry should first justify the demand for English teachers, plan training programs and arrange for an appropriate division of labor between local and foreign teachers. Ideally, it should give priority to hiring foreign trainers to train local teachers, and hiring foreign educators to compile teaching materials. This would make good use of the foreign teachers' skills -- a good justification for hiring them at high salaries. This will also divide the work between local and foreign teachers and avoid a mutual crowding-out effect between local and foreign teachers.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS