The mood surrounding this year's Christmas period is quite different from previous years. There is more anxiety than joy. This is very different from the message of jubilation that this holiday usually brings to Taiwan and other places around the world. The shadow of war and chaos appears to be drowning the auspiciousness of Christmas.
In Christianity, the greatest significance of Jesus' birth should be that he brought humanity the hope of peace and love and allowed all people under the sun to share this message through the celebration of his birthday. Out of this healthy and meaningful hope grows vitality and the spirit of loving others like oneself, which makes everyone willing to love and help each other and to help those who need help while raising one's vision, renouncing violence and interacting with each other peacefully. If this is the case, then there will naturally be no violence and war in this world. As such, regardless of their religious affiliations, people should not reject such an inspiring truth.
In the last 10 years of the last century, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, humanity left behind the potential crisis of a third World War. No one would have anticipated that no sooner did we enter the new century than we would be facing a serious threat of terrorism targeting the US and many other countries. Chilling terrorist attacks have wrapped the entire world in the gloom of the US anti-terror campaign. This year the world is again overshadowed by a possible US and UK joint attack against Iraq. This has hindered the prospects of an international financial recovery. The economies of various regions remain sluggish and many people feel uncertain about their futures. A milieu of pessimism permeates everywhere. This certainly affects people's moods even as they try to celebrate Christmas.
We cannot help but ask whether this conflict -- which began from an excessive rich-poor divide and religious differences and expanded into a conflict between ethnic groups and religions -- should be resolved by military means as the ideological conflicts of the last century were resolved? On the other hand, do the sufferings of a small number of people and their disagreement with other people's lifestyles justify the killing of innocent people and the unleashing of terror throughout the world? What exactly did we learn from the two World Wars and numerous other conflicts large and small in the last century? History has already taught us that genocidal methods like those employed by Nazi Germany, the Khmer Rouge and Yugoslavia's Slobodan Milosevic cannot solve humanity's conflicts.
World peace has been threatened by terrorism right at the beginning of a new century. What can we do to reverse this situation and prevent it from worsening? We believe world peace cannot be achieved in one stroke. It takes more tolerance, mutual trust and communication to nurture it. Perhaps, the US could take the initiative by demonstrating its Christian spirit, attaching more importance to the plight of people in poor countries, treating other countries with sincerity and humility and showing love for the world's peoples. Only then can the virus of ethnic hostility stop breeding and spreading. Only then will it be meaningful to greet and celebrate Christmas. Only then will there be real hope for world peace.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS