The mood surrounding this year's Christmas period is quite different from previous years. There is more anxiety than joy. This is very different from the message of jubilation that this holiday usually brings to Taiwan and other places around the world. The shadow of war and chaos appears to be drowning the auspiciousness of Christmas.
In Christianity, the greatest significance of Jesus' birth should be that he brought humanity the hope of peace and love and allowed all people under the sun to share this message through the celebration of his birthday. Out of this healthy and meaningful hope grows vitality and the spirit of loving others like oneself, which makes everyone willing to love and help each other and to help those who need help while raising one's vision, renouncing violence and interacting with each other peacefully. If this is the case, then there will naturally be no violence and war in this world. As such, regardless of their religious affiliations, people should not reject such an inspiring truth.
In the last 10 years of the last century, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, humanity left behind the potential crisis of a third World War. No one would have anticipated that no sooner did we enter the new century than we would be facing a serious threat of terrorism targeting the US and many other countries. Chilling terrorist attacks have wrapped the entire world in the gloom of the US anti-terror campaign. This year the world is again overshadowed by a possible US and UK joint attack against Iraq. This has hindered the prospects of an international financial recovery. The economies of various regions remain sluggish and many people feel uncertain about their futures. A milieu of pessimism permeates everywhere. This certainly affects people's moods even as they try to celebrate Christmas.
We cannot help but ask whether this conflict -- which began from an excessive rich-poor divide and religious differences and expanded into a conflict between ethnic groups and religions -- should be resolved by military means as the ideological conflicts of the last century were resolved? On the other hand, do the sufferings of a small number of people and their disagreement with other people's lifestyles justify the killing of innocent people and the unleashing of terror throughout the world? What exactly did we learn from the two World Wars and numerous other conflicts large and small in the last century? History has already taught us that genocidal methods like those employed by Nazi Germany, the Khmer Rouge and Yugoslavia's Slobodan Milosevic cannot solve humanity's conflicts.
World peace has been threatened by terrorism right at the beginning of a new century. What can we do to reverse this situation and prevent it from worsening? We believe world peace cannot be achieved in one stroke. It takes more tolerance, mutual trust and communication to nurture it. Perhaps, the US could take the initiative by demonstrating its Christian spirit, attaching more importance to the plight of people in poor countries, treating other countries with sincerity and humility and showing love for the world's peoples. Only then can the virus of ethnic hostility stop breeding and spreading. Only then will it be meaningful to greet and celebrate Christmas. Only then will there be real hope for world peace.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS