The sufferings of Taiwan's farmers and fishermen did not begin today, but these good people are often misled and abused by those with ulterior motives. Government reforms of the credit departments of farmers' and fishermen's associations have been criticized as a plan to annihilate them. This misunderstanding has driven President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) government into a corner, prompting a number of Cabinet ministers to tender their resignations.
Taiwan's farmers and fishermen deserve respect and gratitude for their past contribution to Taiwan's economy. However, the difficulties they face today are a result of government policies that overemphasized industry at the expense of the agricultural sector. Another factor was the KMT's practice of gaining control over the associations by manipulating their board elections and appointment of executives. Most of these KMT-cultivated cadres hail from local factions and gangs.
The KMT turned a blind eye to their abuses of power -- such as lending to their cronies without sufficient collateral -- because these cadres campaigned for the KMT during elections. This has led to today's high non-performing loans (NPLs) ratios at these grassroots credit units -- far higher than the overall average in Taiwan's financial industry. These institutions are losing at least NT$10 billion a year due to corruption by board members and managers.
Faced with this, the government needs to adopt heavy-handed measures to implement reform and to stop people sucking dry the farmers' and fishermen's savings. However, the government has obviously underestimated the power of a counterattack by corrupt forces among the normally oppressed farmers and fishermen, with assistance from ambitious politicians. Because these politicians are controlling all the farmers' and fishermen's organizations, they know how to use the latent dissatisfaction to add fuel to the fire, saying that the government -- by taking over the management of credit units with excessive NPL-ratios -- is aiming to terminate all 344 farmers' and fishermen's associations. By doing this, these politicians have awoken deep-seated fears among the farming and fishing population that they will not be able to find credit in the future and that this will have a serious impact on their livelihood. This is why they are participating in the demonstrations and protests to such a degree.
We should severely condemn the politicians who hide behind the scenes and their parties to engage in political wrangling at the cost of social stability. Their target is nothing less than the presidential elections, more than one year away. Some of them are also trying to pave the way for their party candidates in the fight against the DPP candidates in the upcoming mayoral elections in Taipei and Kaohsiung.
Some have pointed out that about 300,000 farmers and fishermen originally planned to participate in the protest -- the biggest of its kind in Taiwan's history. More than 100,000 showed up yesterday, and if each of them spent NT$1,000, the cost of the protest would be about NT$100 million. At a time when both farmers' and fishermen's associations are complaining about their financial difficulties, where did such a large sum of money come from?
While the helplessness of the local farmers and fishermen who protested on the streets is understandable, it is unacceptable for any political parties or politicians to use the issue to their own political advantage. Politicians should let them air their grievances -- not distort the development of Taiwan's democratic politics.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS