The annual Golden Horse Film Festival awards ceremony was held in Kaohsiung yesterday. Because the organizers had invited several Chinese actors and wanted to avoid political conflict, they did not invite President Chen Shui-bian (
Things are, however, not that simple. Chinese films are registered to participate in the festival, and last year's best actor and actress, who had agreed to participate, are also Chinese. Once the debate over whether to invite Chen surfaced, they immediately withdrew their participation. This was obviously due to China-related political factors. The organizers clearly do not consider national sovereignty, and are guilty of nothing short of belittling Taiwan. It is sad to see the Golden Horse Film Festival come to this.
Arthur Iap (
We agree. By accommodating China, the organizers are letting it use Taiwanese government funds to wage a war of cultural unification on Taiwan.
The Golden Horse Awards ceremony is a grand occasion in film circles. But the meaning of the annual awards has become distorted, turning both government and organizers into losers. In future, perhaps film circles should reconsider the value of the festival's continued existence. The government should also review whether there are other ways to boost the local movie industry, apart from funding the festival.
Why does Taiwan's film industry indulge China this way? The only explanation is that they harbor unrealistic dreams about the China market. That audience of 1.2 billion people has featured in their fantasies as they have searched for a source of new vitality since Taiwan's own film market went into recession.
Taiwan long ago opened its doors to allow imports of Chinese movies, but only last year, after striving for 12 years to break into the China market, was one Taiwanese movie imported by China -- after passing through mandatory censorship for ideologically sensitive material. The door to the China market remains firmly closed.
Even if the exchanges are one-sided, however, Taiwan's film circles are willing to accept setbacks with resignation and try to accommodate China to win favor. They compete for opportunities to cooperate with China in producing films or strive for the rights to distribute Chinese films. How ludicrous!
The salaries of the Golden Horse film festival organizers come largely from Taiwanese taxpayer's pockets. But for fear of offending China, they repeatedly debase themselves and even threaten to call off the show.
One is left feeling that they are ignorant and crass. If we let this group continue to steer Taiwan's film world, it's very hard to feel optimistic that better days will follow. The time has come for a thorough overhaul.
If the people in Taiwan's film circles pledge their allegiance to China's communist regime, we advise the government not only to stop subsidizing the Golden Horse Film Festival, but also to get rid of the awards all together. Beginning next year, let the organizers go participate in Chinese film festivals -- that is, if Beijing will let them.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS