Lee Teng-hui (
Lee's travel plans are sensitive because he is a former president and because he stands for Taiwan's independent sovereignty. He defined cross-strait relations as "special state-to-state" in nature and refused to accept Beijing's "one country, two sys-tems" formula. Beijing hates Lee with a passion. The fact that Lee's travels will bring the voice of the people of Taiwan to the international community irks Beijing no end.
Lee's last trip to Japan in April last year was made for medical reasons -- although he managed to get quite a bit of sightseeing in as well. Despite intense pressure from Beijing, then prime minister Yoshiro Mori agreed to approve Lee's visa application. Lee went to Japan as an ordinary citizen of Taiwan and got a chance to view the cherry blossoms.
Despite his low-profile approach, he was welcomed by the Japanese public, many of whose members see in him the archetypal Japanese spirit that they rarely come across in their own country. Lee's writings and biographies are hugely popular in Japan, where the public are curious about a man who has been Japanese, Chinese and Taiwanese at different periods of his life and who appears to have integrated into his personality Japanese, Chinese and Western education. His political and economic achievements as a president also spark interest. The affinity shown by ordinary Japanese toward Lee has further deepened Beijing's hostility.
While Taiwan and Japan do not have diplomatic relations they certainly have very close trade, political and security ties. Interaction in the private sector also runs deep. Lee's visa application should be a simple matter.
As an ordinary citizen Lee poses no security threat to Japan and has a legitimate reason to visit. He abided by the terms Tokyo laid out for his previous visit and did not do anything to make the Japanese government unhappy. Japan is fully justified in issuing him a visa. The only stumbling block is Beijing's attitude.
But issuing a visa is about Japan's exercise of its own sovereignty. Should Tokyo worry about what Beijing thinks? After all, nothing really happened after Tokyo offended Beijing by giving Lee a visa last year. Would China really forgive Tokyo's earlier "lapse" if it were to reject a second visa application? Only by issuing Lee a visa for a short, private visit can Japan truly exercise its sovereignty and prove that it suffers no Sino-phobia.
Without harassment from the pro-China faction, Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi should be able to view Lee's matter for what it is -- a visa application from a private -- if not exactly ordinary -- citizen.
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
This month’s news that Taiwan ranks as Asia’s happiest place according to this year’s World Happiness Report deserves both celebration and reflection. Moving up from 31st to 27th globally and surpassing Singapore as Asia’s happiness leader is gratifying, but the true significance lies deeper than these statistics. As a society at the crossroads of Eastern tradition and Western influence, Taiwan embodies a distinctive approach to happiness worth examining more closely. The report highlights Taiwan’s exceptional habit of sharing meals — 10.1 shared meals out of 14 weekly opportunities, ranking eighth globally. This practice is not merely about food, but represents something more
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
RSS