The debate in the media and in the legislature on the problem of direct links between China and Taiwan took off when Jiang Zemin (江澤民) began to use the international media to put his spin on the issue before visiting the US last month and it has continued up to the recent opening of the CCP's 16th National Congress. Viewing the matter solely from the perspective of reports promoting direct links in unificationist media, one could get the mistaken impression that all Taiwanese are heedless of their own security and support their immediate implementation.
Even the view presented on Thursday by the Ministry of National Defense (MND) opposing the use of Taipei's Sungshan Airport as a service point for direct air links has been severely criticized by unificationist media and legislators. They have repeatedly argued in China's defense, saying that modern warfare doesn't require surprise attacks by fighter aircraft -- comments which mock the military preparations and strategic planning of the MND.
If the use of the capital city's airport is not man-aged appropriately, key targets will be left highly vulnerable. The crux of the matter is that no buffer region surrounds the Sungshan airport in the case of a sudden military attack. An airplane could veer over to the Presidential Office in 50 seconds. All actions to prevent the enemy from advancing an attack would take place in downtown Taipei.
Actually, there is no need for the MND to conjecture that China will launch a surprise attack on Taiwan. As long as the unificationist media and certain elected officials continue to serve as China's mouthpieces there will be no need for China to waste a single soldier forcing Taiwan's capitulation. The real threat to national security stems from the unificationist media creating a false impression of security and causing the nation to lower its guard.
We must admit that any plans for direct links will only benefit a small minority. This includes the less than two percent of the population with business dealings in China and as well as mainlanders who might wish to return to China to visit relatives. This latter group accounts for 13 percent of the population, with the number making regular trips back and forth amounting to less than two percent. Regardless of how it is done, opening the door to direct links just to meet the demands of these minority groups while sacrificing the safety and financial security of the majority is not the action of a responsible government.
This is why we support the government's point of view on cross-strait related issues: national security must come first. How can Taiwan possibly drop its guard when China still sees Taiwan as its main potential enemy and has 400 missiles deployed along its southern coastline?
On Friday, President Chen Shui-bian (
If the unificationist media continues to mislead public opinion, we suggest that the direct links issue be decided according to democratic principles, in a referendum. We cannot sacrifice the safety of over 95 percent of the people of Taiwan for the convenience of a minority of less than five percent.
US$18.278 billion is a simple dollar figure; one that’s illustrative of the first Trump administration’s defense commitment to Taiwan. But what does Donald Trump care for money? During President Trump’s first term, the US defense department approved gross sales of “defense articles and services” to Taiwan of over US$18 billion. In September, the US-Taiwan Business Council compared Trump’s figure to the other four presidential administrations since 1993: President Clinton approved a total of US$8.702 billion from 1993 through 2000. President George W. Bush approved US$15.614 billion in eight years. This total would have been significantly greater had Taiwan’s Kuomintang-controlled Legislative Yuan been cooperative. During
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in recent days was the focus of the media due to his role in arranging a Chinese “student” group to visit Taiwan. While his team defends the visit as friendly, civilized and apolitical, the general impression is that it was a political stunt orchestrated as part of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, as its members were mainly young communists or university graduates who speak of a future of a unified country. While Ma lived in Taiwan almost his entire life — except during his early childhood in Hong Kong and student years in the US —
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers on Monday unilaterally passed a preliminary review of proposed amendments to the Public Officers Election and Recall Act (公職人員選罷法) in just one minute, while Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators, government officials and the media were locked out. The hasty and discourteous move — the doors of the Internal Administration Committee chamber were locked and sealed with plastic wrap before the preliminary review meeting began — was a great setback for Taiwan’s democracy. Without any legislative discussion or public witnesses, KMT Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), the committee’s convener, began the meeting at 9am and announced passage of the
In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.” Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?” According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning,
RSS