European companies have been largely excluded from Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) due to the dominant role of China’s state-owned enterprises and opaque bidding processes, a survey said, raising questions about the nation’s commitment to opening the program to the world.
A small number of European companies in China are involved in BRI, the EU Chamber of Commerce in China said in a survey of its members released yesterday in Beijing, with transparency topping the list of challenges European companies face.
A slightly larger number of European companies have seen positive knock-on effects through access to new logistics options and increased trade flows with countries hosting projects, it said.
“One of the most notable aspects about BRI-related projects is that they are rarely transparent,” the report said, adding that the businesses had come up against challenges to participation since the program’s inception.
Given the initiative’s scale, most respondents referred to their level of involvement as “crumbs from the table,” the report said.
Of 132 respondents to the chamber’s survey, just 20 indicated they had bid on at least one BRI-related project, with seven bidding as direct contractors and 13 as subcontractors.
Most of them participated after being pulled in by Chinese business partners or the government. All but a scant few have played niche roles, such as providing certain technology, it said.
More than half of respondents said there was insufficient information available to European companies seeking to make bids, and nearly 40 percent said that procurement systems for BRI-related projects were not transparent enough.
“China’s colossal national champions — boosted by state aid and cheap financing — are securing an unusually large proportion of contracts when compared to multilateral development schemes,” chamber president Joerg Wuttke said. “Europe needs to determine how to respond to this export of the China model to shield itself from market distortions and stay competitive in third-country markets.”
Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Geng Shuang (耿爽) said that Chinese and foreign companies participating in the BRI followed market rules “based on the principle of fairness.”
“They participate in specific projects in an open and transparent way. The bidding process is transparent,” Geng told reporters in Beijing. “Whether companies participate or not is entirely companies’ own choice.”
The report comes as BRI has attempted to clean up its image after criticism that it is a debt trap for poor countries and allegations of corruption.
While it has advocated for the program to be more open, the chamber said it was not yet an inclusive, open global initiative.
Improving the quality of the projects is critical to “prevent ‘promise fatigue’ from once again becoming endemic in the international community,” it said.
The Chinese government clearly took note of some negative perceptions of the BRI during the initiative’s first half decade and “took corrective action,” the report said.
About a quarter of respondents indicated that the BRI was changing, trending toward improvement rather than worsening across various aspects of the initiative.
Italy became the first G7 nation to sign up for BRI in March last year.
As of June last year, China had established third-party market cooperation mechanisms with 14 developed countries, including France and Japan.
Third-party market cooperation — signing up a developed nation to help build infrastructure in Belt and Road countries — is the focus of the next phase of BRI to depoliticize the project and bring in more stakeholders, Bloomberg reported.
The BRI cooperation paper is chiefly a political declaration by two governments, Wuttke said.
In terms of business, “it has yet to produce any new opportunities for that country’s companies, and hasn’t driven the openness, transparency and accountability that we enjoy in multilateral finance schemes or schemes run by OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development] member countries like Japan,” he said.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) would not produce its most advanced technologies in the US next year, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said yesterday. Kuo made the comment during an appearance at the legislature, hours after the chipmaker announced that it would invest an additional US$100 billion to expand its manufacturing operations in the US. Asked by Taiwan People’s Party Legislator-at-large Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) if TSMC would allow its most advanced technologies, the yet-to-be-released 2-nanometer and 1.6-nanometer processes, to go to the US in the near term, Kuo denied it. TSMC recently opened its first US factory, which produces 4-nanometer
GREAT SUCCESS: Republican Senator Todd Young expressed surprise at Trump’s comments and said he expects the administration to keep the program running US lawmakers who helped secure billions of dollars in subsidies for domestic semiconductor manufacturing rejected US President Donald Trump’s call to revoke the 2022 CHIPS and Science Act, signaling that any repeal effort in the US Congress would fall short. US Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, who negotiated the law, on Wednesday said that Trump’s demand would fail, while a top Republican proponent, US Senator Todd Young, expressed surprise at the president’s comments and said he expects the administration to keep the program running. The CHIPS Act is “essential for America leading the world in tech, leading the world in AI [artificial
REACTIONS: While most analysts were positive about TSMC’s investment, one said the US expansion could disrupt the company’s supply-demand balance Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) new US$100 billion investment in the US would exert a positive effect on the chipmaker’s revenue in the medium term on the back of booming artificial intelligence (AI) chip demand from US chip designers, an International Data Corp (IDC) analyst said yesterday. “This is good for TSMC in terms of business expansion, as its major clients for advanced chips are US chip designers,” IDC senior semiconductor research manager Galen Zeng (曾冠瑋) said by telephone yesterday. “Besides, those US companies all consider supply chain resilience a business imperative,” Zeng said. That meant local supply would
Servers that might contain artificial intelligence (AI)-powering Nvidia Corp chips shipped from the US to Singapore ended up in Malaysia, but their actual final destination remains a mystery, Singaporean Minister for Home Affairs and Law K Shanmugam said yesterday. The US is cracking down on exports of advanced semiconductors to China, seeking to retain a competitive edge over the technology. However, Bloomberg News reported in late January that US officials were probing whether Chinese AI firm DeepSeek (深度求索) bought advanced Nvidia semiconductors through third parties in Singapore, skirting Washington’s restrictions. Shanmugam said the route of the chips emerged in the course of an