T-Mobile US Inc chief executive officer John Legere said that his company does not use equipment from Huawei Technologies Co (華為) and will not after buying Sprint Corp to form a bigger No. 3 in the US wireless market.
“Let me be clear — we do not use Huawei or ZTE (中興) network equipment in any area of our network. Period. And we will never use it in our 5G network,” Legere said in written testimony prepared for a hearing yesterday before the US House of Representatives’ Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.
The statement is in response to critics who have raised the issue of the Chinese equipment maker as a risk to national security to build opposition to the proposed US$26.5 billion merger.
Sprint parent Softbank Group Corp has “significant ties” to Huawei, as does T-Mobile parent Deutsche Telekom AG, said Carri Bennet, general counsel for the Rural Wireless Association that represents smaller competitors to the merging parties.
Huawei supplies Deutsche Telekom, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
“Allowing a Japanese-influenced company and German-influenced company to merge when both have significant 5G ties to Huawei appears to run counter to US national security concerns,” Bennet said in testimony submitted for the hearing.
Lawmakers and the administration of US President Donald Trump say Huawei poses a potential security threat, if only because it cannot buck orders from the Chinese government, and US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo this week urged Europeans to shun the Shenzhen-based company.
Huawei says it is privately held, does not take orders from the Beijing government and would not do so because that would ruin its business that relies on income worldwide.
The US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is considering whether to effectively ban Huawei from US networks; already, the company’s gear is effectively limited to small providers attracted by low prices.
Still, critics bring up Huawei and perils that are likewise ascribed to ZTE Corp, another Chinese gear maker.
“T-Mobile, Sprint, and their parent companies refuse to commit to the American public not to use the Chinese companies in building 5G infrastructure if allowed to merge,” Protect America’s Wireless, a group that has held several news conferences critical of the merger, said in a press release on Tuesday.
The group has refused to disclose its backers.
Legere seemed to have the group in mind.
“Opponents of the transaction have set up a shadowy group that refuses to disclose its donors, to lob allegations that this transaction will allow Huawei and ZTE into US networks,” the T-Mobile chief said in his testimony.
“That’s false, and they know it is,” he added.
A US watchdog group that checks the national security implications of deals — the Committee on Foreign Investment in the US — has approved the proposed merger, the companies said in December last year.
It is not clear how much weight the security concerns will carry in the debate.
Nine US senators in a Tuesday letter raised other consequences as they urged the FCC and the US Department of Justice to kill the deal.
Problems include less competition, higher bills and lost jobs, the lawmakers said.
Legere said that the merger would produce more jobs, lower prices and competition for market leaders AT&T Inc, Verizon Communications Inc and even cable providers such as Comcast Corp.
Sprint executive chairman Marcelo Claure in prepared testimony said the merger would give the combined company resources to build a “transformative” 5G network offering high speeds.
The decision on whether the deal can go ahead does not rest with lawmakers, but with regulators at the FCC and the justice department, who are influenced by Congress.
Taiwan’s technology protection rules prohibits Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) from producing 2-nanometer chips abroad, so the company must keep its most cutting-edge technology at home, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said yesterday. Kuo made the remarks in response to concerns that TSMC might be forced to produce advanced 2-nanometer chips at its fabs in Arizona ahead of schedule after former US president Donald Trump was re-elected as the next US president on Tuesday. “Since Taiwan has related regulations to protect its own technologies, TSMC cannot produce 2-nanometer chips overseas currently,” Kuo said at a meeting of the legislature’s
GEOPOLITICAL ISSUES? The economics ministry said that political factors should not affect supply chains linking global satellite firms and Taiwanese manufacturers Elon Musk’s Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) asked Taiwanese suppliers to transfer manufacturing out of Taiwan, leading to some relocating portions of their supply chain, according to sources employed by and close to the equipment makers and corporate documents. A source at a company that is one of the numerous subcontractors that provide components for SpaceX’s Starlink satellite Internet products said that SpaceX asked their manufacturers to produce outside of Taiwan because of geopolitical risks, pushing at least one to move production to Vietnam. A second source who collaborates with Taiwanese satellite component makers in the nation said that suppliers were directly
Top Taiwanese officials yesterday moved to ease concern about the potential fallout of Donald Trump’s return to the White House, making a case that the technology restrictions promised by the former US president against China would outweigh the risks to the island. The prospect of Trump’s victory in this week’s election is a worry for Taipei given the Republican nominee in the past cast doubt over the US commitment to defend it from Beijing. But other policies championed by Trump toward China hold some appeal for Taiwan. National Development Council Minister Paul Liu (劉鏡清) described the proposed technology curbs as potentially having
EXPORT CONTROLS: US lawmakers have grown more concerned that the US Department of Commerce might not be aggressively enforcing its chip restrictions The US on Friday said it imposed a US$500,000 penalty on New York-based GlobalFoundries Inc, the world’s third-largest contract chipmaker, for shipping chips without authorization to an affiliate of blacklisted Chinese chipmaker Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp (SMIC, 中芯). The US Department of Commerce in a statement said GlobalFoundries sent 74 shipments worth US$17.1 million to SJ Semiconductor Corp (盛合晶微半導體), an affiliate of SMIC, without seeking a license. Both SMIC and SJ Semiconductor were added to the department’s trade restriction Entity List in 2020 over SMIC’s alleged ties to the Chinese military-industrial complex. SMIC has denied wrongdoing. Exports to firms on the list