Chinese investors are eager to jump on Iceland’s tourism gravy train, but the trouble is, the locals are not that welcoming.
With the North Atlantic nation fully reintegrated into the international community, its government is now looking to tighten a law that limits foreign ownership of Icelandic land.
The move comes amid a surge in foreign visitors and fresh attempts by an unidentified Chinese entrepreneur to acquire a 12km2 plot of real estate and build a holiday resort inside the island’s so-called Golden Circle, Iceland’s most popular tourist destination.
A far more ambitious Chinese bid was blocked in 2012.
“We have increasing requests for exemptions to buy land,” Icelandic Minister of Justice Sigridur Andersen said by telephone in Reykjavik.
At the same time, the ministry is facing calls from within its own government and the opposition for the law to be revised.
A draft bill is expected to be submitted during the current legislature, Andersen said.
As the law stands, land can only be bought by Icelandic nationals, citizens of the European Economic Area or foreigners who have resided in Iceland for at least five years prior to the purchase.
The bone of contention is a provision that allows exemptions to the rules to be granted by the ministry.
Months after engaging in a legal battle with a local venture capital firm over ownership of a famous lagoon, the government risks sending out fresh protectionist messages to the international investment community.
“All restrictions discourage foreign investment,” said Asgeir Jonsson, associate professor of economics at the University of Iceland. “If we just look at the tourism sector, you need to own land to build a hotel or offer recreational activities.”
The authorities should set rules that are coherent with normal business practices and be committed to following them, Jonsson said.
“Clarity and predictability are the most important thing,” he said. “Every investor dislikes uncertainty or the rules being changed.”
The land that the Chinese investors are targeting is advertised at US$11.4 million and is 97km east of the capital, close to Iceland’s iconic Geyser and Gullfoss, “the golden waterfall.”
Bodvar Sigurbjornsson, the lawyer overseeing the transaction, confirmed the interest, but would not name the potential buyer.
Tourism is now Iceland’s No. 1 export, thanks in part to its location for scenes featured in James Bond movies and Game of Thrones.
Foreign appetite for Icelandic land comes amid a booming property market — house prices have increased 54.6 percent in real terms between their December 2009 low and July this year, according to Statistics Iceland — and the race for the Arctic’s resources.
Icelandic-Chinese Trade Council official Olafur Stephensen said that Chinese interest is only set to grow.
“We are experiencing quite a strong increase in business interest from China and I foresee Chinese investments increasing,” Stephensen said.
The government, for its part, wants to boost its pro-business credentials while acknowledging that feelings about sovereignty run deep in the North Atlantic nation.
In 2012, the law prevented Chinese billionaire Huang Nubo (黃怒波) from buying a 300km2 piece of land in the north of Iceland.
The current bid is for a much smaller area, but looks set to share a similar fate.
TAKING STOCK: A Taiwanese cookware firm in Vietnam urged customers to assess inventory or place orders early so shipments can reach the US while tariffs are paused Taiwanese businesses in Vietnam are exploring alternatives after the White House imposed a 46 percent import duty on Vietnamese goods, following US President Donald Trump’s announcement of “reciprocal” tariffs on the US’ trading partners. Lo Shih-liang (羅世良), chairman of Brico Industry Co (裕茂工業), a Taiwanese company that manufactures cast iron cookware and stove components in Vietnam, said that more than 40 percent of his business was tied to the US market, describing the constant US policy shifts as an emotional roller coaster. “I work during the day and stay up all night watching the news. I’ve been following US news until 3am
UNCERTAINTY: Innolux activated a stringent supply chain management mechanism, as it did during the COVID-19 pandemic, to ensure optimal inventory levels for customers Flat-panel display makers AUO Corp (友達) and Innolux Corp (群創) yesterday said that about 12 to 20 percent of their display business is at risk of potential US tariffs and that they would relocate production or shipment destinations to mitigate the levies’ effects. US tariffs would have a direct impact of US$200 million on AUO’s revenue, company chairman Paul Peng (彭雙浪) told reporters on the sidelines of the Touch Taiwan trade show in Taipei yesterday. That would make up about 12 percent of the company’s overall revenue. To cope with the tariff uncertainty, AUO plans to allocate its production to manufacturing facilities in
COLLABORATION: Given Taiwan’s key position in global supply chains, the US firm is discussing strategies with local partners and clients to deal with global uncertainties Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD) yesterday said it is meeting with local ecosystem partners, including Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), to discuss strategies, including long-term manufacturing, to navigate uncertainties such as US tariffs, as Taiwan occupies an important position in global supply chains. AMD chief executive officer Lisa Su (蘇姿丰) told reporters that Taiwan is an important part of the chip designer’s ecosystem and she is discussing with partners and customers in Taiwan to forge strong collaborations on different areas during this critical period. AMD has just become the first artificial-intelligence (AI) server chip customer of TSMC to utilize its advanced
Six years ago, LVMH’s billionaire CEO Bernard Arnault and US President Donald Trump cut the blue ribbon on a factory in rural Texas that would make designer handbags for Louis Vuitton, one of the world’s best-known luxury brands. However, since the high-profile opening, the factory has faced a host of problems limiting production, 11 former Louis Vuitton employees said. The site has consistently ranked among the worst-performing for Louis Vuitton globally, “significantly” underperforming other facilities, said three former Louis Vuitton workers and a senior industry source, who cited internal rankings shared with staff. The plant’s problems — which have not