Low interest rates and favorable tax environments are stoking the fires of takeovers, with about a quarter of big groups now on the lookout for targets in the next 12 months, a study found last week.
“Plans for transformational acquisitions are accelerating,” the survey by consultancy Ernst and Young (EY) concluded.
The pharmaceutical sector has led the way so far this year with deals worth US$150 billion, according to consultancy Dealogic, and that does not include a failed bid worth US$117 billion by US firm Pfizer for British-Swedish group AstraZeneca.
On Friday, a bid worth US$46 billion by US drugs laboratory AbbVie was rejected by Shire Pharmaceuticals, which is listed in London and New York, but based in Dublin.
On Wednesday, US group Valeant launched a hostile bid of US$53.5 billion for Allergan.
Much of this is driven by a need to grow and cut costs to counter the expiration of some patents on high-earning drugs, analysts say.
The survey assessment by EY backs up comments from analysts for some time that ultra-low interest rates by several leading central banks are one of the main factors reigniting interest in takeovers.
Other forces are at work as well: During the financial crisis that began in 2008 and the subsequent eurozone debt crisis, many big companies restructured their businesses and hoarded cash. They did not have sufficient confidence in the outlook to invest, even by borrowing cheap money being pushed at the banking system by some central banks.
However, now many businesses are gaining confidence in the recovery and are looking to expand by buying other businesses, which can offer a faster route to growth than setting up new operations, and may be less risky.
EY interviewed 1,600 executives in companies in 54 countries. It found that the number of big groups willing to launch takeovers of than US$500 million had doubled in 12 months to 27 percent of the total. Those willing to do deals of more than US$1 billion had doubled to 12 percent.
Their willingness to take on debt to finance deals was the highest for five years.
Many companies are under pressure from aggressive shareholders to cut costs, which could make company boards highly selective in looking at targets.
“After a prolonged financial crisis and merger-and-acquisition [M&A] market malaise, companies and boards are opting for quality rather than quantity,” said the head of M&A activity in France for EY, Rudy Cohen Scali.
Recently US and European companies have led M&A activity, but emerging companies could begin to play a significant role, led by China and India, the report said.
“The top five investment destinations balance emerging markets such as India and China with a continued focus on mature markets such as the US, UK and Germany,” it found.
The EY report said that “30 percent of executives perceive global political instability to be the greatest economic risk.”
Henderson Global Investors’ data last month showed that in the first quarter of the year, big companies had raised dividend payouts to shareholders by nearly a third.
With the crises fading, and despite sluggish growth “all over the markets there is liquidity waiting to be used,” Paris-based Barclays Bourse portfolio manager Renaud Murail said then.
“American companies have accumulated huge warchests,” he said.
At investment group Amundi, global head of equities Romain Boscher said at the time: “The wave of mergers and acquisitions is just beginning.”
Cohen Scali said in the EY report: “The fundamentals for high-value deal-making are very favorable... However, the complexity of the challenge facing executives today means M&A is more measured.”
Michael Hewson, chief market analyst at CMC Markets UK, contested suggestions that the upsurge of M&A activity reflects renewed confidence in some parts of the global economy, saying that one driving factor was a search by US companies to use their piles of cash abroad in a way which would not attract tax if the money were sent to headquarters in the US.
Pfizer’s failed attempt to acquire AstraZeneca “was the most high-profile attempt” to use cash, he said.
With many stock markets close to record highs, boardrooms were considering buying back shares, or returning reserves to shareholders — citing Rolls-Royce this week as the latest example of this.
Attempts by US group General Electric to buy a large part of French engineering group Alstom could also be motivated in part by the fact that it had US$57 billion outside the US at the end of last year, he said.
This raised questions about “the value and reasons behind these deals,” Hewson said.
DOLLAR CHALLENGE: BRICS countries’ growing share of global GDP threatens the US dollar’s dominance, which some member states seek to displace for world trade US president-elect Donald Trump on Saturday threatened 100 percent tariffs against a bloc of nine nations if they act to undermine the US dollar. His threat was directed at countries in the so-called BRICS alliance, which consists of Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates. Turkey, Azerbaijan and Malaysia have applied to become members and several other countries have expressed interest in joining. While the US dollar is by far the most-used currency in global business and has survived past challenges to its preeminence, members of the alliance and other developing nations say they are fed
LIMITED MEASURES: The proposed restrictions on Chinese chip exports are weaker than previously considered, following lobbying by major US firms, sources said US President Joe Biden’s administration is weighing additional curbs on sales of semiconductor equipment and artificial intelligence (AI) memory chips to China that would escalate the US crackdown on Beijing’s tech ambitions, but stop short of some stricter measures previously considered, said sources familiar with the matter. The restrictions could be unveiled as soon as next week, said the sources, who emphasized that the timing and contours of the rules have changed several times, and that nothing is final until they are published. The measures follow months of deliberations by US officials, negotiations with allies in Japan and the Netherlands, and
Foxconn Technology Group (富士康科技集團) yesterday said it expects any impact of new tariffs from US president-elect Donald Trump to hit the company less than its rivals, citing its global manufacturing footprint. Young Liu (劉揚偉), chairman of the contract manufacturer and key Apple Inc supplier, told reporters after a forum in Taipei that it saw the primary impact of any fresh tariffs falling on its clients because its business model is based on contract manufacturing. “Clients may decide to shift production locations, but looking at Foxconn’s global footprint, we are ahead. As a result, the impact on us is likely smaller compared to
TRUMP EFFECT: The chip component manufacturer has moved 80 percent of its resistor production to factories in Malaysia from China, ahead of likely harsh US tariffs Kaimei Electronic Corp (凱美), a supplier of passive components, yesterday said it has allocated a majority of its chip resistor manufacturing capacity to a Malaysian factory from China to brace for potential tariff hikes on Chinese goods from the US. The company’s remarks came amid investors’ growing concern about escalating trade frictions between China and the US, and how the US’ new trade policies would play out after US president-elect Donald Trump takes office on Jan. 20. Trump has threatened to levy 10 percent more on Chinese imports. “We have deployed a full production line this year in Malaysia to produce chip