Sat, Apr 26, 2014 page15

• Tech firms agree to settle hiring suit

  MILLION-DOLLAR DEAL: One of the companies denied any wrongdoing, but agreed to its part in the US$324 million deal to avoid the uncertainties and cost of legal action

  • Reuters, SAN FRANCISCO
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Four major tech companies, including Apple Inc and Google Inc, have agreed to pay a total of US$324 million to settle a lawsuit accusing them of conspiring to hold down salaries in Silicon Valley, sources familiar with the deal said, just weeks before a high-profile trial had been scheduled to begin.

  Tech workers filed a class action lawsuit against Apple, Google, Intel Corp and Adobe Systems Inc in 2011, alleging they conspired to refrain from soliciting one another’s employees to avert a salary war.

  The workers planned to ask for US$3 billion in damages at the trial, according to court filings. That could have tripled to US$9 billion under antitrust law.

  The case has been closely watched due to the potentially high damages award and the opportunity to peek into the world of Silicon Valley’s elite. The case was based largely on e-mails in which Apple’s late cofounder, Steve Jobs, former Google CEO Eric Schmidt and some of their Silicon Valley rivals hatched plans to avoid poaching each other’s prized engineers.

  In one e-mail exchange after a Google recruiter solicited an Apple employee, Schmidt told Jobs that the recruiter would be fired, court documents show. Jobs then forwarded Schmidt’s note to a top Apple human resources executive with a smiley face.

  Another exchange shows Google’s human resources director asking Schmidt about sharing its no-cold call agreements with competitors.

  Schmidt, now Google’s executive chairman, advised discretion.

  “Schmidt responded that he preferred it be shared ‘verbally, since I don’t want to create a paper trail over which we can be sued later,’” he said, according to a court filing.

  The human resources director agreed.

  The companies had acknowledged entering into some no-hire agreements, but disputed the allegation that they had conspired to drive down wages. Moreover, they argued that the employees should not be allowed to sue as a group.

  Rich Gray, a Silicon Valley antitrust expert in private practice, said the companies had an incentive to avoid trial because their executives’ e-mails would make them look extremely unsympathetic to a jury. However, the plaintiff attorneys risked an appeals court saying the engineers could not sue as a group at all.

  “An appellate court could say: ‘Hey we just don’t buy that,’” Gray said.

  Trial had been scheduled to begin at the end of next month on behalf of roughly 64,000 workers.

  Spokespeople for Apple, Google and Intel declined to comment. An Adobe representative said that the company denies it engaged in any wrongdoing, but settled “in order to avoid the uncertainties, cost and distraction of litigation.”

  An attorney for the plaintiffs, Kelly Dermody of Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, in a statement called the deal “an excellent resolution.”

  The four companies in 2010 settled a US Department of Justice probe by agreeing not to enter into such no-hire deals in the future. They had since been fighting the civil antitrust class action.

  The plaintiffs and the companies will disclose principal terms of the settlement by May 27, according to the court filing on Thursday, though it is unclear whether that will spell out what each company will pay.

  Some Silicon Valley companies refused to enter into no-hire agreements. Facebook chief operating officer Sheryl Sandberg, for instance, rebuffed an entreaty from Google in 2008 that they refrain from poaching each other’s employees.

  Additionally, Apple’s Jobs threatened Palm with a patent lawsuit if Palm did not agree to stop soliciting Apple employees. However, then-Palm chief executive Edward Colligan told Jobs that the plan was “likely illegal,” and that Palm was not “intimidated” by the threat.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Taiwan’s fall would be a ‘disaster’: Colby

  • 2

    Taiwan rejects China’s UN claim

  • 3

    China could ‘arrest’ Taiwanese abroad

  • 4

    MAC condemns entertainers’ China posts

  • 5

    What TSMC’s $100 billion investment in the US means for Taiwan