An airline pilots’ strike in Germany last week has highlighted the power comparatively small groups of employees have to cripple key areas of Germany’s economy in pursuit of their own interests.
The German government is looking to draw up legislation later this year to prevent recurrences.
“One company, one wage agreement” is the motto behind a proposed Tarifeinheit or unified wage-bargaining mechanism masterminded by German Federal Minister of Labor and Social Affairs Andrea Nahles.
Over three days last week, the pilots’ union effectively grounded Germany’s biggest airline, Lufthansa, in a dispute over pay and early retirement entitlements.
Between Wednesday and Friday, Lufthansa — which employsabout 117,000 — was forced to cancel 3,800 flights, stranding nearly half-a-million passengers, because of a dispute concerning as few as 5,400 employees.
While Lufthansa generally avoided travel chaos by warning passengers and helping them to rebook, the walkout affected more people than any of the rare strikes held by the massive IG Metall metalworkers’ union with its more than 2 million members.
Other unions representing smaller professions — such as the Marburger Bund for hospital doctors and UFO for airline cabin crew — can have similar sway.
“I would wish that the most powerful employees within a company would use their strength to support the weakest and not merely in their own interests,” Nahles said.
Hagen Lesch, an expert from the IW economic think tank which is close to employers, analyzed 123 wage disputes and found that unions representing narrower interests were more likely to strike.
Lufthansa knows all about this.
Last summer, its Germanwings unit was threatened with walkouts by the cabin crew union, following similar strikes the previous year.
In a country used to such negotiations by sector giants such as IG Metall or Verdi, the smaller unions tend to flex their muscles most, such as the train drivers union, which halted rail traffic in 2007.
However, Nahles, of the Social Democrats, is keen to make it clear that employees’ fundamental right to strike is not under threat.
“The project is not aimed at tampering with the right to strike, but at reorganizing unified wage-bargaining. We want a single wage deal applicable across the entire company,” Social Democrat member of parliament Katja Mast said.
However, for the time being “it’s still at a consultation stage on a ministerial level. There is nothing concrete,” she said.
The interior and justice ministries are involved, and Nahles hopes to present a draft law “this year.”
The issue is delicate, because if smaller unions are prohibited from making demands while a principal wage agreement is still in place, it is difficult to see how it cannot impinge on their right to strike.
The unions seem torn.
While the DGB trade union federation said in 2010 that it was in favor of such a rule, it has backpedaled since.
“Fundamentally speaking, we don’t think it can be good if divisional unions push through their own interests without considering the wider good,” DGB official Rainer Hoffmann said.
“We as unions are in favor of wage-bargaining that is based on solidarity. But only on the condition that the right to strike is not interfered with,” Hoffmann added.
The head of the giant services sector union Verdi, Frank Bsirske, said he was critical of the government’s plans and skeptical about their implementation.
Employers will be less difficult to convince.
“The smaller a group of striking workers is, the higher the obstacles should be for industrial action,” Lufthansa chief executive Wolfgang Franz told the business daily Handelsblatt.
The pilots’ strike ended on Friday, but no new negotiations are yet in sight.
Taiwan’s technology protection rules prohibits Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) from producing 2-nanometer chips abroad, so the company must keep its most cutting-edge technology at home, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said yesterday. Kuo made the remarks in response to concerns that TSMC might be forced to produce advanced 2-nanometer chips at its fabs in Arizona ahead of schedule after former US president Donald Trump was re-elected as the next US president on Tuesday. “Since Taiwan has related regulations to protect its own technologies, TSMC cannot produce 2-nanometer chips overseas currently,” Kuo said at a meeting of the legislature’s
TECH WAR CONTINUES: The suspension of TSMC AI chips and GPUs would be a heavy blow to China’s chip designers and would affect its competitive edge Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), the world’s biggest contract chipmaker, is reportedly to halt supply of artificial intelligence (AI) chips and graphics processing units (GPUs) made on 7-nanometer or more advanced process technologies from next week in order to comply with US Department of Commerce rules. TSMC has sent e-mails to its Chinese AI customers, informing them about the suspension starting on Monday, Chinese online news outlet Ijiwei.com (愛集微) reported yesterday. The US Department of Commerce has not formally unveiled further semiconductor measures against China yet. “TSMC does not comment on market rumors. TSMC is a law-abiding company and we are
FLEXIBLE: Taiwan can develop its own ground station equipment, and has highly competitive manufacturers and suppliers with diversified production, the MOEA said The Ministry of Economic Affairs (MOEA) yesterday disputed reports that suppliers to US-based Space Exploration Technologies Corp (SpaceX) had been asked to move production out of Taiwan. Reuters had reported on Tuesday last week that Elon Musk-owned SpaceX had asked their manufacturers to produce outside of Taiwan given geopolitical risks and that at least one Taiwanese supplier had been pushed to relocate production to Vietnam. SpaceX’s requests place a renewed focus on the contentious relationship Musk has had with Taiwan, especially after he said last year that Taiwan is an “integral part” of China, sparking sharp criticism from Taiwanese authorities. The ministry said
US President Joe Biden’s administration is racing to complete CHIPS and Science Act agreements with companies such as Intel Corp and Samsung Electronics Co, aiming to shore up one of its signature initiatives before US president-elect Donald Trump enters the White House. The US Department of Commerce has allocated more than 90 percent of the US$39 billion in grants under the act, a landmark law enacted in 2022 designed to rebuild the domestic chip industry. However, the agency has only announced one binding agreement so far. The next two months would prove critical for more than 20 companies still in the process