The New York Stock Exchange on Saturday did a test run of Twitter’s highly anticipated market debut, as it seeks to avoid the types of problems that plagued Facebook’s initial public offering on rival NASDAQ.
The Big Board, run by NYSE Euronext, regularly does systems testing on the weekends, but this was the first time it had run a simulated IPO, and it did so at the request of its member firms — many of whom took part in Facebook’s IPO last year on NASDAQ OMX Group’s main exchange.
The NYSE was testing mainly for two things: To see if its systems could handle the amount of message traffic that might be generated by the IPO; and to make sure that once the IPO took place any firms that placed orders would promptly receive the reports telling them that their orders had been executed.
It can also be seen as part of NYSE’s struggle with NASDAQ for supremacy in technology listings. Both exchanges vied to be home to Twitter’s stock, and many analysts said the trading disruptions that occurred on Facebook’s NASDAQ debut likely played to NYSE’s favor, as it tries to become the destination of choice for technology listings, something NASDAQ once dominated.
BIGGEST IPO
Twitter, which intends to sell 70 million shares at between US$17 and US$20 each, will be holding the biggest Internet IPO since Facebook, which sold a much larger 421 million shares at US$38 each. Twitter is expected to start trading as early as Nov. 7.
In the case of Facebook, the tremendous volume of orders on the first day of trading exposed a glitch in NASDAQ’s system, ultimately preventing timely order confirmations for many traders, leaving them unsure about their exposure for hours, and in some cases for days afterwards. Major market makers estimated they lost collectively up to US$500 million in the IPO.
The absence of NASDAQ CEO Robert Greifeld while the meltdown was occurring magnified the criticism toward the exchange — he had been celebrating the debut at Facebook’s California headquarters before jumping on a plane back to New York.
NASDAQ was fined US$10 million by the US Securities and Exchange Commission — the largest fine ever for an exchange — and said it would voluntarily pay up to US$62 million to compensate firms that had been harmed. On Friday, NASDAQ said US$41.6 million of claims put forward qualified for the compensation plan.
FACEBOOK CHAOS
The chaotic debut also contributed to a decline in Facebook’s stock. The stock hit a low of US$17.55 in August, though it has since more than recovered the losses, closing on Friday at US$51.95, well above its IPO price.
While NASDAQ had tested its systems in the lead-up to the IPO, allowing member firms to place dummy orders to a test symbol over a specific period, it limited the total number of orders that could be received in the simulation to 40,000.
On the day of the IPO, more than 496,000 orders were placed before the IPO opened, with about 82 million shares traded. By the end of the day, more than 500 million shares had traded hands, a record for an IPO.
NO CHANCES
NYSE’s tests on Saturday ran hundreds of thousands of orders, with one single firm placing an order at one point for nearly 81 million shares.
“This morning’s systems test was successful, and we’re grateful to all the firms that chose to participate,” an NYSE spokesman said.
“We are being very methodical in our planning for Twitter’s IPO, and are working together with the industry to ensure a world-class experience for Twitter, retail investors and all market participants,” he added.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday obtained the government’s approval to inject an additional US$7.5 billion into its US subsidiary, the Department of Investment Review said in a statement. The department approved TSMC’s application of investing in TSMC Arizona Corp, which is engaged in the manufacturing, sales, testing and design of IC and other semiconductor devices, it said. The latest capital injection follows a US$5 billion investment for TSMC Arizona approved in June. The chipmaker has broken ground on two advanced fabs in Arizona with aggregated investments approved by the department totaling US$24 billion thus far. According to TSMC, the first Arizona
The lethal hack of Hezbollah’s Asian-branded pagers and walkie-talkies has sparked an intense search for the devices’ path, revealing a murky market for older technologies where buyers might have few assurances about what they are getting. While supply chains and distribution channels for higher-margin and newer products are tightly managed, that is not the case for older electronics from Asia where counterfeiting, surplus inventories and complex contract manufacturing deals can sometimes make it impossible to identify the source of a product, analysts and consultants say. The response from the companies at the center of the booby-trapped gadgets that killed 37
FRIENDLY TAKEOVER: While Qualcomm Inc’s proposal to buy some or all of Intel raises the prospect of other competitors, Broadcom Inc is staying on the sidelines Qualcomm Inc has approached Intel Corp to discuss a potential acquisition of the struggling chipmaker, people with knowledge of the matter said, raising the prospect of one of the biggest-ever merger and acquisition deals. California-based Qualcomm proposed a friendly takeover for Intel in recent days, said the sources, who asked not to be identified discussing confidential information. The proposal is for all of the chipmaker, although Qualcomm has not ruled out buying some parts of Intel and selling off others. It is uncertain whether the initial approach would lead to an agreement and any deal is likely to come under close antitrust scrutiny
SECURITY CONCERNS: The proposed ban on Chinese autonomous vehicle software and hardware would go into effect with the 2027 and 2030 model years respectively The US Department of Commerce today is expected to propose prohibiting Chinese software and hardware in connected and autonomous vehicles on US roads due to national security concerns, two sources said. US President Joe Biden’s administration has raised concerns about the collection of data by Chinese companies on US drivers and infrastructure as well as the potential foreign manipulation of vehicles connected to the Internet and navigation systems. The proposed regulation would ban the import and sale of vehicles from China with key communications or automated driving system software or hardware, said the two sources, who declined to be identified because the