Entrepreneur Binod Hariharan has big plans for his southern Indian firm, which develops astrology-based computer software to help users find a suitable spouse or plot their career paths.
Similarly ambitious is Somporn Maneeratanakul, managing director of Thai Software Enterprises, and Nguyen Minh Duc, director of BKIS Security, a Vietnamese company that makes anti-virus programs.
But their dreams of making it big overseas are in danger of being hijacked in the dangerous waters of the global software industry by pirates who make and sell illegal copies of their products right in their home markets.
PHOTO: AFP
While global giants such as Microsoft and computer security firm McAfee are prominent targets of copyright thieves, what is less known is that start-up Asian software companies are notable victims, industry players said.
And unlike the cash-rich industry big boys, these fledgling Asian companies are finding it harder to cope with losses resulting from copyright violations.
Industry group Business Software Alliance (BSA) said in a report this month that software piracy losses reached US$51.4 billion last year, of which US$16.5 billion was incurred in the Asia-Pacific region.
On average, 59 percent of the 900 million pieces of software installed in the Asia-Pacific region were unlicensed, according to the study, which was carried out with industry research firm IDC.
Bangladesh had the highest software piracy rate in Asia, followed by Sri Lanka, Indonesia and Vietnam, with China and India also among the top culprits.
Beyond the revenue losses, the bigger impact is that piracy prevents Asia from producing software giants such as Microsoft’s Bill Gates, analysts said.
“Piracy certainly stifles innovation,” said Tarun Sawney, Asia-Pacific senior director for anti-piracy operations at BSA.
“Why is it that we don’t have any sort of global software company that originated from our part of the world?” he said during an interview at BSA’s regional office in Singapore.
“Yet in the United States, where the laws are very strong and the piracy rate is very low, we have idea, after idea, after idea taking over the whole world — be it Yahoo, be it Facebook, be it a Microsoft operating system,” he said.
Hariharan, chairman and director of astrology software developer Astro-Vision Futuretech Ltd, knows this only too well.
“If we need to survive in the market, we need to ensure that the piracy level of our software is kept down,” he said by telephone from his office in Cochin, a city in India’s Kerala state.
Fighting piracy means diverting precious funds to build protection mechanisms into the firm’s software, Hariharan said.
Installing security mechanisms also complicates the use of the software, requiring more technical support and ultimately making the product more expensive, Hariharan said.
Somporn says one big misconception is that “piracy only impacts large, international software developers.”
Large companies can cope with the revenue losses arising from illegal copying, but for firms that cater to domestic markets, opportunities are limited by piracy, he said in an e-mail.
Another “big myth” is that the piracy rate would fall if software prices were low, said Somporn, whose company employs 30 professionals and claims an annual turnover of around US$1 million.
He said a product made by his company that sells for as little as US$6 is among the most pirated in Thailand.
Nguyen Minh Duc tells a similar story.
Piracy has forced his company to invest additional resources to protect its products.
“This is a drain on our resources, which could otherwise have been used on research and development to develop better products for our customers,” he said.
BSA said the greatest damage to the industry is inflicted by companies — from small and medium enterprises to multinational corporations — using bootleg computer software, rather than by individuals.
“Surprisingly, quite a few listed companies are caught using pirated software. They just have unsophisticated or no software management policies in place,” said Jeffrey Hardee, BSA’s vice president and regional director. “It’s quite shocking.”
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday obtained the government’s approval to inject an additional US$7.5 billion into its US subsidiary, the Department of Investment Review said in a statement. The department approved TSMC’s application of investing in TSMC Arizona Corp, which is engaged in the manufacturing, sales, testing and design of IC and other semiconductor devices, it said. The latest capital injection follows a US$5 billion investment for TSMC Arizona approved in June. The chipmaker has broken ground on two advanced fabs in Arizona with aggregated investments approved by the department totaling US$24 billion thus far. According to TSMC, the first Arizona
The lethal hack of Hezbollah’s Asian-branded pagers and walkie-talkies has sparked an intense search for the devices’ path, revealing a murky market for older technologies where buyers might have few assurances about what they are getting. While supply chains and distribution channels for higher-margin and newer products are tightly managed, that is not the case for older electronics from Asia where counterfeiting, surplus inventories and complex contract manufacturing deals can sometimes make it impossible to identify the source of a product, analysts and consultants say. The response from the companies at the center of the booby-trapped gadgets that killed 37
FRIENDLY TAKEOVER: While Qualcomm Inc’s proposal to buy some or all of Intel raises the prospect of other competitors, Broadcom Inc is staying on the sidelines Qualcomm Inc has approached Intel Corp to discuss a potential acquisition of the struggling chipmaker, people with knowledge of the matter said, raising the prospect of one of the biggest-ever merger and acquisition deals. California-based Qualcomm proposed a friendly takeover for Intel in recent days, said the sources, who asked not to be identified discussing confidential information. The proposal is for all of the chipmaker, although Qualcomm has not ruled out buying some parts of Intel and selling off others. It is uncertain whether the initial approach would lead to an agreement and any deal is likely to come under close antitrust scrutiny
SECURITY CONCERNS: The proposed ban on Chinese autonomous vehicle software and hardware would go into effect with the 2027 and 2030 model years respectively The US Department of Commerce today is expected to propose prohibiting Chinese software and hardware in connected and autonomous vehicles on US roads due to national security concerns, two sources said. US President Joe Biden’s administration has raised concerns about the collection of data by Chinese companies on US drivers and infrastructure as well as the potential foreign manipulation of vehicles connected to the Internet and navigation systems. The proposed regulation would ban the import and sale of vehicles from China with key communications or automated driving system software or hardware, said the two sources, who declined to be identified because the